Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:15:52.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Notes on Catullus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. P. Postgate
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , July 1899 , pp. 294 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1899

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 295 note 1 So Palmer reads with the MSS. and it may stand.

page 295 note 2 For the confusion of et and m see Prop. 4, 11, 21, cited in Silua Maniliana p. 21. The confusion of et, ex and e is discussed ib. pp. 63 sqq.

page 296 note 1 Some may prefer flagranti, and there is exactly the same doubt at Prop. 4, 7, 48, ‘ardente (or ardenti, MSS. ardent)e nostro dotem habitura rogo.’