Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T14:24:17.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentaries on Aeneid 10 and 11 - S. J. Harrison: Vergil Aeneid 10. (Oxford Classical Monographs.) Pp. xliii + 303. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. £40. - K. W. Gransden: Virgil Aeneid Book XI. (Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics.) Pp. viii + 152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. £30 (Paper, £11.95).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2009

D. E. Hill
D. E. Hill
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , October 1993 , pp. 261 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 At 246–7, the particular Homeric formula imitated is identified.

2 The definition offered is largely negative; the positive part, though quite long, seems to mean no more than ‘Virgil’. The idea also occurs in his Virgil's Iliad (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 155–156Google Scholar, where it attracts some comment from H. (CR 36 [1986], 38).

3 As indicated above, the definition of the term offered on p. 6 is utterly impenetrable.

4 See Servius on Virg. Aen. 2.565 (quoted by Austin).