Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:05:09.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Crux Criticorum (et interpretum) In Seneca the Elder's Controversiae (2. 4. 12)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Lennarth Håkanson
Affiliation:
Uppsala University

Extract

The argumentum of contr. 2. 4 reads as follows (quoted from my own provisional text, which I hope will be published in some years):

Abdicavit quidam filium. Abdicatus se contulit ad meretricem. Ex ilia sustulit filium. Aeger ad patrem misit; cum venisset, commendavit ei filium suum et decessit. Adoptavit puerum <pater>. Ab altero [pater] filio accusatur dementiae.

Type
Shorter Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sénèque le rhèteur, controverses et suasoires (Paris, 1902Google Scholar; new edition Paris, 1932); The Elder Seneca, Declamations (Loeb, 1976)Google Scholar.

2 In accusing his father of dementia, the son would blame his disinherited and departed brother for his immoral life in a brothel and question whether the grandson was really the son of his brother, at the same time sneering at his mother, the meretrix; cp. §5 or 10.

3 Having deprived aliquid of imbecilli, both Bornecque and Winterbottom find themselves forced to add something of their own, but neither addition suits the context very well.

4 L. Annaei Senecae Oratorum et rhetorum sententiae divisiones colores (Vienna 1887, Hildesheim, 1963)Google Scholar.