Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:56:36.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Promoting Client and Worker Competence in Child Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2024

Anthony N. Maluccio*
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, Greater Hartford Campus, West Hartford, Conn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the field of child welfare there is general agreement about the inadequacies and questionable effectiveness of the service delivery system. Study after study suggests that there is a wide gap between the promise of child welfare services and their performance. For instance, while the goal of a permanent home for each child has become accepted at the philosophical level, it is still far from being realized in practice, for many children are drifting in temporary, inappropriate placements.

Various solutions to these problems are usually offered, including more staff, more and better training, improved practice technology, and social action or social reform. While all these remedies are important, none would deal adequately with a recurring problem, namely, the failure of the service delivery system to promote the competence of clients and social workers in carrying out their roles and coping with life challenges. Much could be accomplished if we reconceptualized and changed practice so that it might be more conducive to the effective functioning of clients as well as social workers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Footnotes

*

Rosemary Calder. Paper delivered at the Intercountry Adoption Seminar of the ICSW Asia & Pacific Region Conference Melbourne. August, 1979.

References

1. Fanshel, David and Shinn, Eugene. B., Children in Foster Care: a Logitudinal Investigation (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978);Google Scholar
Gruber, Alan R., Children in Foster Care – Destitute, Neglected … Betrayed (New York: Human Services Press, 1978).Google Scholar
2. This section is adapted from Maluccio, Anthony N.. ‘Competence-Oriented Social Work Practice: an Ecological Approach’, in Malluccio, Anthony M., ed., Promoting Competence in Clients — a New/Old Approach to Social Work Intervention (New York: Free Press, 1980), pp. 124.Google Scholar
3. Allport, Gordon W., Pattern and Growth in Personality (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1961).Google Scholar
4. White, Robert W., ‘Motivation Reconsidered: the Concept of Competence’, Psychological Review, LXVI (1959), 297333;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Robert W., ‘Strategies of Adaptation; an Attempt at Systematic Description’, in Coelho, George, Hamburg, David A., and Adams, John E., eds., Coping and Adaptation (New York: Basic Books, 1974), pp. 4768.Google Scholar
5. Sundberg, Norman D., Snowden, Lonnie R., and Reynolds, William M., ‘Toward Assessment of Personal Competence and Incompetence in Life Situations’, Annual Review of Psychology, XXIX (1978), 179211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ripple, Lillian, Alexander, Ernestina, and Polemis, Bernice W., Motivation, Capacity, and Opportunity (Chicago: University of Chicago, School of Social Service Administration, 1964).Google Scholar
7. White, ‘Motivation Reconsidered’.Google Scholar
8. Leci, Edward L., Intrinsic Motivation (New York and London: Plenum Press, 1975).Google Scholar
9. Maslow, Abraham H., Motivation and Personality (2nd ed.: New York: Harper & Row, 1954).Google Scholar
10. Germain, Carel B. and Gitterman, Alex, The Life Model of Social Work Practice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
11. Maluccio, op. cit.Google Scholar
12. See Studt, Elliot, ‘Social Work Theory and Implications for the Practice of Methods’, Social Work Education Reporter, XVI (1968), 2224, 4246.Google Scholar
13. Hartman, Ann L., ‘The Extended Family as a Resource for Change: an Ecological Approach to Family-centered Practice’, in Germain, Carel B., ed., Social Work Practice: People and Environments (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979), pp. 239–66.Google Scholar
14. Germain, Carel B., ‘Ecology and Social Work’, in Germain, , ed. op. cit., pp. 122.Google Scholar
15. Maluccio, Anthony N., ‘Promoting Competence through Life Experiences’, in Germain, , ed., op. cit. p. 289.Google Scholar
16. Maluccio, Anthony N., Learning from Clients — Interpersonal helping as Viewed by Clients and Social Workers (New York: Free Press, 1979).Google Scholar
17. This section is in part adapted from Maluccio, Anthony N., ‘An Ecological Perspective on Practice with Parents of Children in Foster Care’, in Maluccio, Anthony N. and Sinanoglu, Paul A., eds., The Challenge of Partnership: Working with Parents of Children in Foster Care (New York: Child Welfare League of America; forthcoming).Google Scholar
18. Reynolds, Bertha C., ‘Between Client and Community: a Study of Responsibility in Social Casework’, Smith College Studies in Social Work, V(1934), 5128.Google Scholar
19. Meyer, Carol H., ‘What Directions Social Work Practice?’ Social Work, XXIV (1979), 266–73.Google Scholar
20. Children’s Defense Fund, Children without Homes (Washington, D.C.: the Fund, 1978).Google Scholar
21. Laird, Joan, ‘An Ecological Approach to Child Welfare: Issues of Family Identity and Continuity’, in Germain, , ed., op.cit., p. 177.Google Scholar
22. Simmons, Gladys, Gumpert, Joanne, and Rothman, Beulah, ‘Natural Parents as Partners in Child Care Placement’, Social Casework, LIV(1973), 224–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Ibid., p. 232.Google Scholar
24. Davies, Linda and Bland, David, The Use of Foster Parents as Role Models for Parents’, Child Welfare, LVII(1978), 380–86.Google Scholar
25. Nayman, Louis and Witkin, Stanley L., ‘Parent/Child Foster Placement: an Alternate Approach in Child Abuse and Neglect’, Child Welfare LVII(1978) 249–58.Google Scholar
26. Hartmann, Heinz, Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation (New York: International Universities Press, 1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Carroll, Nancy A. and Reich, John W., ‘Issues in Implementation of the Parent Aide Concept’, Social Casework, LIX(1978), 152–60;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, Lauren A. and Barton, Karen S., ‘Home Management Services for Families with Disturbed Children’, Child Welfare, LIX(1980), 4352.Google Scholar
28. Finkelstein, Nadia E., ‘Family-centered Group Care — the Children’s Institution from a Living Center to a Center for Change’, in Maluccio, and Sinanoglu, , eds., op. cit.Google Scholar
29. Lahti, Janet et al., A Follow-up Study of the Oregon Project (Portland, Oreg.: Regional Research Institute for Human Services, 1978).Google Scholar
30. Maluccio, , ‘Promoting Competence in Clients’, p. 290.Google Scholar
31. Carbino, Rosemarie, ‘Developing a Parent Organization: New Roles for Parents of Children in Foster Care’, in Maluccio, and Sinanoglu, , eds., pop. cit.Google Scholar
32. Hartmann, op. cit.Google Scholar
33. Smith, M. Brewster, ‘Competence and Socialization’, in Clausen, John A., ed., Socialization and Society (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1968), pp. 270320.Google Scholar
34. Cf.Ryan, Patricia, McFadden, Emily Jean, and Warren, Bruce L., ‘Foster Families: a Resource for Helping Biological Parents’, in Maluccio, and Sinanoglu, , eds., op. cit.Google Scholar
35. Maybanks, Sheila and Bryce, Mervin, eds., Home-based Services for Children and Families — Policy, Practice, and Research (Springfield, III.: Charles C. Thomas, 1979).Google Scholar
36. Maluccio, Learning from Clients.Google Scholar
37. Ibid., p. 198.Google Scholar
38. Minuchin, Salvador, ‘The Plight of the Poverty-stricken Family in the United States’, Child Welfare, XLIX(1970), 124–30.Google Scholar
39. Germain, and Gitterman, , op. cit.Google Scholar
40. Reid, William J., The Task-centered System (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
41. Guerney, Bernard G. Jr., Relationship Enchancement (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977).Google Scholar