Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:59:33.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural casework — A Social Work Method for Family Settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2024

Martin Herbert  and
Brenda O’Driscoll
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Contemporary behaviour modification (or therapy) seems to offer what is both a useful theoretical and practical approach to the treatment of a very wide range of childhood and adolescent disorders (Gelfand and Hartmann, 1975; Herbert, 1975). We intend in this paper to describe this relatively new method of assessment and treatment of problem behaviour as it applies in family settings, and examine its relevance to social work practice. In doing this we shall consider briefly the nature of the social work task. After a discussion of the theoretical basis of behaviour therapy we shall attempt to demonstrate how the methods themselves can be applied in the social work setting giving examples from our casework in the Child Treatment Research Unit (C.T.R.U.) at the School of Social Work, Leicester University.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , July 1978 , pp. 14 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Footnotes

*

Professor Herbert is Director of the School of Social Work, University of Leicester, England, and Brenda O'Driscoll is a research worker in the Child Treatment Research Unit

References

Baker, B. L. ‘Symptom treatment and symptom substitution in enuresis’ Abnormal Psychology, 1969, 74, 1, 42–49.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. Principles of Behaviour Modification New York; Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1969.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. & Walters, R. H. Social Learning and Personality Development New York; Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1963.Google Scholar
Cautela, J. R. 'Covert sensitization Psychological Record, 1967, 20, 459–468.Google ScholarPubMed
Cautela, J. R. ‘Desensitization and insight’ Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1965, 3, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, J. & Gochros, H. L. Planned Behaviour Change: Behaviour Modification in Social Work London; Collier Macmillan; 1975.Google Scholar
Gelfand, D. M. & Hartmann, D. P. ‘Behaviour therapy and children: a review and evaluation of research methodology’ Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 204–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelfand, D. M. & Hartmann, D. P. Child Behaviour: Analysis and Therapy Oxford; Pergamon Press; 1975.Google Scholar
Herbert, M. Emotional Problems of Development in Children London; Academic Press; 1974.Google Scholar
Herbert, M. Problems of Childhood: A Guide for All Concerned London; Pan Books; 1975.Google Scholar
Herbert, M. Conduct Disorders of Childhood and Adolescence: A Behavioural Approach to Assessment and Treatment Chichester; John Wiley; 1978.Google Scholar
Herbert, M. & Iwaniec, D. ‘Behavioural casework of conduct-disordered children at the Child Treatment Research Unit’ Social Work Today, 1977 (in press).Google Scholar
Herbert, M. & Iwaniec, D. The Formation of a Parents Group for Training in, and Discussion of, Child-Management Procedures Leicester; Child Treatment Research Unit; 1977.Google Scholar
Herbert, M. & Iwaniec, D. ‘Children who are difficult to love’ New Society, 1977, 40, 759, 111–112.Google Scholar
Hollis, F. Social Casework: A Psycho-social Therapy New York; Random House; 1964.Google Scholar
Jehu, D., et al Behaviour Modification in Social Work London; Wiley; 1972.Google Scholar
Jones, M. C. ‘The elimination of children's fear’ Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1924, 7, 383–390.Google Scholar
Kanfer, F. H. & Karoly, P. ‘Self-control: a behaviouristic excursion into the lion's den’ Behavior Therapy, 1972, 3, 398–416.Google Scholar
Leung, F. L. ‘The ethics and scope of behaviour modification’ Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1975, 28, 376–379.Google Scholar
Mickelson, D. J. & Stevic, R. R. ‘Differential effects of facilitative and non-facilitative behavioural consellors’ Journal of Counselling Psychology, 1971, 18, 314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. Personality and Assessment New York; Wiley; 1968.Google Scholar
O'Dell, S. ‘Training parents in behaviour modification: a review’ Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 7, 418–433.Google Scholar
O'Leary, K. D., Poulos, R. W. and Devine, V. T. ‘Tangible reinforcers: bonuses or brides?’ Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972, 38, 1–8.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R. et al A Social Learning Approach to Family Intervention: Vol. 1, Families with aggressive children Eugene; Castalix Publishing Co.; 1975.Google Scholar
Persons, R. W. ‘Psychological and behavioural change in delinquents following psychotherapy’ Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1966, 22, 337–340.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D. A. ‘Some implications of sychotherapy research for clinical psychology’ British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1975, 48, 199–206.Google Scholar
Stolz, S. B., Wienckowski, L. A. & Brown, B. S. ‘Behaviour modification: a perspective on critical issues’ American Psychologist, November 1975, 1027.Google Scholar
Tharp, R. G. & Wetzel, R. J. Behaviour Modification in the Natural Environment New York; Academic Press; 1969.Google Scholar
Truax, C. B., ‘Reinforcement and non-reinforcement in Rogerian psychotherapy’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966, 71, 1–9.Google Scholar
Truax, C. B. & Carkhuff, R. R. Toward Effective Counselling and Psychotherapy Chicago; Aldine; 1976.Google Scholar
Vitalo, R. L. ‘Effects of facilitative interpersonal functioning in a conditioning paradigm’ Journal of Counselling Psychology, 1970, 17, 141–144.Google Scholar
Wolpe, J. The Practice of Behaviour Therapy 2nd ed. New York; Pergamon Press; 1973.Google Scholar
Yelloly, M. Chapter on ‘Insight’ in Jehu, D., et al Behaviour Modification in Social Work London; Wiley; 1972.Google Scholar
Younghusband, E. Social Work and Social Values London; Allen & Unwin; 1967.Google Scholar