Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:02:36.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Success in a Fontan pregnancy: how important is ventricular function?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2018

M. Victoria Ordonez
Affiliation:
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
Johanna Trinder
Affiliation:
St Michael’s Hospital, Bristol, UK
Stephanie L. Curtis*
Affiliation:
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Stephanie L. Curtis, MB, ChB, BSc (Hons), FRCP, FESC, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK. Tel: +44 117 342 5967; Fax: 00 173 422 5968; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The Fontan operation is a palliative surgical procedure for patients whose hearts cannot support a biventricular circulation. The haemodynamic changes that occur in pregnancy are particularly challenging for Fontan patients and the outcomes are variable. We present a case where fetal outcome was particularly poor despite a lack of high risk features pre-pregnancy.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Cite this article: Ordonez MV, Trinder J, Curtis SL. (2018). Success in a Fontan pregnancy: how important is ventricular function? Cardiology in the Young page 225 of 227. doi: 10.1017/S1047951118001865

References

1. Greutmann, M, Pieper, PG. Pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2015; 36.37: 24912499.10.1093/eurheartj/ehv288Google Scholar
2. Thorne, S, MacGregor, A, Nelson-Piercy, C. Risks of contraception and pregnancy in heart disease. Heart. 2006; 92: 15201525.Google Scholar
3. Drenthen, W, Boersma, E, Balci, A, et al. Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 21242132.Google Scholar
4. Gewillig, M, Brown, SC. The Fontan circulation after 45 years: update in physiology. Heart. 2016; 102: 10811086.10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307467Google Scholar
5. Canobbio, MM, Mair, DD, van der Velde, M, Koos, BJ. Pregnancy outcomes after the Fontan repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 763767.10.1016/0735-1097(96)00234-3Google Scholar
6. Gouton, M, Nizard, J, Patel, M, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancy with Fontan circulation: a multicentric observational study. Int J Cardiol 2015; 187: 8489.10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.344Google Scholar
7. Zentner, D, Kotevski, A, King, I, Grigg, L, d’Udekem, Y. Fertility and pregnancy in the Fontan population. Int J Cardiol 2016; 208: 97101.Google Scholar
8. Bonner, SJ, Asghar, O, Roberts, A, Vause, S, Clarke, B, Keavney, B. Cardiovascular, obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women with previous Fontan repair. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 219: 5356.Google Scholar
9. Arif, S, Chaudhary, A, Paul, F, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with a Fontan circulation and proposal for a risk-scoring system: single centre experience. J Congenit Cardiol 2017; 1: 10.Google Scholar
10. Cauldwell, M, Steer, PJ, Bonner, S, et al. Retrospective UK multicentre study of the pregnancy outcomes of women with a Fontan repair. Heart 2018; 104: 401406.Google Scholar