Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:10:16.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Edwards valve-in-valve implantation in tricuspid position

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2017

Maria Álvarez-Fuente ,
Nikolaus A. Haas  and
Maria Jesus del Cerro
Maria Álvarez-Fuente*
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
Nikolaus A. Haas
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology Department, Klinikum Universität München, München, Germany
Maria Jesus del Cerro
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
*
Correspondence to: M. Álvarez-Fuente, Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Carretera de Colmenar Viejo Km 9,1, 2034, Madrid, Spain. Tel: +34 649 68 09 61; Fax: +34913369027; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present two cases of percutaneous Sapien XT valve-in-valve implantation in the tricuspid position: a 20-year-old man with severe congenital pulmonary stenosis and percutaneous valvuloplasty, who required surgical implantation of two protheses, pulmonary and tricuspid, and a 12-year-old boy with CHD and a degenerated tricuspid prosthesis. We implanted three Sapien XT valve-in-valves, two in the tricuspid position and one in the pulmonic position. Sapien XT valve-in-valve implantation in the tricuspid position is feasible and can decrease the number of surgeries in CHD patients.

Keywords

CHDpercutaneous valve implantationtricuspid valve diseasepulmonary valve disease
Type
Brief Report
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 27 , Issue 8 , October 2017 , pp. 1633 - 1636
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Chang, B, Lim, SH, Yi, G, et al. Long-term clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 845–850.Google Scholar
2. Bonhoeffer, P, Boudjemline, Y, Saliba, Z, et al. Percutaneous replacement of pulmonary valve in a right-ventricle to pulmonary-artery prosthetic conduit with valve dysfunction. Lancet 2000; 356: 1403–1405.Google Scholar
3. Boone, RH, Webb, JG, Horlick, E, et al. Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 286–294.Google Scholar
4. Webb, JG. Trancatheter valve in valve implants for failed prosthetic valves. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 765–766.Google Scholar
5. Eicken, A, Schubert, S, Hager, A, et al. Percutaneous tricuspid valve implantation two-center experience with midterm results. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: e002155.Google Scholar
6. McElhinney, DB, Cabalka, AK, Aboulhosn, JA, et al. Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation for the treatment of dysfunctional surgical bioprosthetic valves: an internation multicenter registry study. Circulation. 2016; 133: 1582–1593.Google Scholar
7. Baig, M, Alli, O, Davies, J. Simultaneous transcatheter pulmonary and tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation for the treatment of failing pulmonary and tricuspid bioprostheses. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 87: 1352–1355.Google Scholar