1 Daniel Latouche montre bien que la croissance du secteur étatique au Québec n'a pas commencé avec la Révolution tranquille, mais n'infirme pas la thèse d'une accentuation et d'une accélération de ce processus après 1960. A quel moment une accentuation quantitative devient-elle qualitative (cette REVUE 7[1974], 525–36)?

2 Faucher, Albert et Lamontagne, Maurice, « History of Industrial Development », Rioux, dans Marcel and Martin, Yves (éds.), French Canadian Society (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1964).Google Scholar « Industrialization has not been a realization of the main ethnic group in the province. …. Some changes have to be introduced in order to keep the nationalistic resentment from being transformed into a fight against capitalism » (269, 271).

3 « In comparison with every other provincial government, the government of Quebec was relatively inactive in the investment field overthe whole period under review. … At a time when the Dominion was engaged in the construction of the National Transcontinental, and the other provinces were rapidly expanding their public programs and supporting developments in the railway and other utilities field, Quebec was expanding its public works program slowly and leaving utilities to others » (Buckley, Kenneth A. H., Capital Formation in Canada [Toronto: Macmillan, 1955], 57).Google Scholar