Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:58:25.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P.005 A virtual interdisciplinary diagnostic memory clinic: rural patient and caregiver satisfaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2023

ME O’Connell
Affiliation:
(Saskatoon)*
R Camicioli
Affiliation:
(Edmonton)
A Cammer
Affiliation:
(Saskatoon)
H Chertkow
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
P Desmarais
Affiliation:
(Montreal)
JD Fisk
Affiliation:
(Halifax)
M Freedman
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
N Friedman
Affiliation:
(Montreal)
M Geddes
Affiliation:
(Montreal)
Z Ismail
Affiliation:
(Calgary)
A Kirk
Affiliation:
(Saskatoon)
L Lee
Affiliation:
(Hamilton)
DG Morgan
Affiliation:
(Saskatoon)
J Pettersen
Affiliation:
(Prince George)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Saskatchewan’s Rural and Remote Memory Clinic (RRMC) has provided post-diagnostic virtual dementia care for approximately 19 years. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and a new need for remote dementia diagnosis, we developed a virtual, team-based, interdisciplinary (neurology, neuropsychology, nursing), diagnostic memory clinic (vRRMC). We evaluated patient and caregiver satisfaction with the new virtual clinic. Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with rural vRRMC patients (n=7), caregivers (n= 13), and one patient/caregiver dyad. Ages of respondents ranged from 40 to 70 years old (60% female). Level of diagnosed cognitive dysfunction ranged from subjective cognitive impairment to major neurocognitive disorder. Respondents saved an average of 460 km of travel compared to a trip to Saskatoon. Results: Thematic analysis of responses revealed universal satisfaction with the virtual model. The technology training sessions, offered prior to the first vRRMC visit, was described as important for satisfaction. Analysis of preference for future visits revealed more nuance; some preferred in-person visits and planned to travel for future appointments post-pandemic, while others preferred to maintain the virtual model due to perceived travel burden (cost, time, and inconvenience). Conclusions: When clinically appropriate, virtual diagnostic memory clinics should persist as an option post pandemic for families who experience high travel burden.

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation