Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:24:01.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Divisibility and Injectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Garry Helzer
Garry Helzer*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park, Md
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the category of abelian groups the concepts of divisible group and injective group coincide. In (4) this is generalized to modules over an integral domain and it is proved for a (commutative) integral domain that the concepts of divisible module and injective module coincide if and only if the ring is hereditary if and only if the ring is a Dedekind domain.

In (8) the assumption of commutativity is dropped and the ring is assumed to have a one-sided field of quotients. The result obtained is essentially the same as in the commutative case; see the theorem following 6.2. In (13) the requirement that the ring have no zero-divisors is also dropped and the ring is assumed to possess what we have called an Ore ring (see the definition following 6.2). The result obtained is the equivalent of parts (a) and (b) of our 6.13.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 18 , 1966 , pp. 901 - 919
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1966

References

1. Bass, H., Finitistic dimension and homological generalization of semi-primary rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 95 (1960), 466–488.Google Scholar
2. Bourbaki, N., Algèbre commutative, Chaps. I and II (Paris, 1961).Google Scholar
3. Bourbaki, N., Algèbre, Chap. 8 (Paris, 1958).Google Scholar
4. Cartan, H. and Eilenberg, S., Homological algebra (Princeton, 1956).Google Scholar
5. Eckmann, B. and Schopf, A., Über injektive Moduln, Arch. Math., 4 (1953), 75–78.Google Scholar
6. Findlay, G. D. and Lambeck, J., A generalized ring of quotients I, II, Can. Math. Bull., 1 (1958), 77–85, 155-167.Google Scholar
7. Gabriel, P., Des catégories abéliennes, Bull. Soc. Math. France, 90 (1962), 323–448.Google Scholar
8. Gentile, E., On rings with a one-sided field of quotients, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 11 (1960), 380–384.Google Scholar
9. Goldie, A. W., Semi-prime rings with maximum condition, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc, Ser. 3, 10 (1960), 201–220.Google Scholar
10. Grothendieck, A., Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique, Tohoku Math. J., Ser. 2, 9 (1960), 119–201.Google Scholar
11. Hattori, A., Torsion theory for general rings, Nagoya Math. J., 17, (1960), 147–158.Google Scholar
12. Kaplansky, I., Projective modules, Ann. Math. (2), 68 (1958), 372–377.Google Scholar
13. Levy, L., Torsion-free and divisible modules over non-integral domains, Can. J. Math., 15 (1963), 132–151.Google Scholar
14. Maranda, J.-M., Infective structures, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 110 (1964), 98–135.Google Scholar
15. Matlis, E., Divisible modules, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 11 (1960), 385–391.Google Scholar
16. Öre, O., Theory of non-commutative polynomials, Ann. Math., (2), 34 (1933), 480–508.Google Scholar
17. Walker, C. L. and Walker, E. A., Quotient categories and rings of quotients (to appear).Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Erratum