Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:37:13.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P033: To choose or not to choose: evaluating the impact of a Choosing Wisely knowledge translation initiative on urban and rural emergency physician guideline awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

K. Chandra*
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Integrated Family/Emergency Residency Program, Saint John, NB
P.R. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Integrated Family/Emergency Residency Program, Saint John, NB
J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Integrated Family/Emergency Residency Program, Saint John, NB
H. Chatur
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Integrated Family/Emergency Residency Program, Saint John, NB
C. Adams
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Integrated Family/Emergency Residency Program, Saint John, NB
*
*Corresponding authors

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Choosing Wisely is an innovative approach to address physician and patient attitudes towards low value medical tests; however, a knowledge translation (KT) gap exists. We aimed to quantify the baseline familiarity of emergency medicine (EM) physicians with the Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) EM recommendations. We then assessed whether a structured KT initiative affected knowledge and awareness. Methods: Physicians working in urban (tertiary teaching hospital, Saint John, NB) and rural (community teaching hospital, Waterville, NB) emergency departments were asked to participate in a survey assessing awareness and knowledge of the first five CWC EM recommendations before an educational intervention. The intervention consisted of a 1-hour seminar reviewing the recommendations, access to a video cast and departmental posters. Knowledge was assessed by asking respondents to identify 80% or more of the recommendations correctly. Physicians were surveyed again at a 6-month follow up period. The Fisher exact test was used for statistical analyses. A sample size of 36 was required to detect a 30% change with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80%. Results: At the urban site, 16 of 25 (64%) physicians responded to the pre- and 14 of 26 (53.8%) responded to the post-intervention survey. Awareness of the EM recommendations did not increase significantly (81.3% pre; 95% CI 56.2-94.2 vs. 92.9% post; 66.4-99.9; p=0.60). There was a weak trend towards improved knowledge with 62.5% (38.5-81.6) of physicians responding correctly initially, and 85.7% (58.8-97.2; p=0.23) after the intervention. At the rural site, 8 of 11 (72.7%) physicians responded to the pre- and post-intervention survey. There was a trend towards improved awareness, (25% pre; 6.3-59.9 vs. 75% post; 40.1-93.7; p=0.13), with 50% (21.5-78.5) responding correctly pre, and 87.5% (50.8-99.9; p=0.28) after the intervention. Conclusion: We have described the current awareness and knowledge of the CWC EM recommendations. Limited by our small sample size, we report a trend towards increased awareness and knowledge at 6 months following our KT initiative in a rural setting where there was a low baseline awareness. At the urban site where baseline knowledge was high, changes seen were less significant. Further work will look at the effectiveness of our initiative on physician practice.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2017