Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:01:48.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on Avian Predators of Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) With Special Reference to Picidae1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Imre S. Otvos
Imre S. Otvos
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four species of woodpeckers (family Picidae) are definitely known to be predaceous on the western pine beetle in the Central Sierra Nevada Mountains in California. These are: Dendrocopus villosus, Dendrocopus pubescens, Dendrocopus albolarvatus and Dryocopus pileatus. The red-shafter flicker (Colaptes cafer, Picidae), creepers (Certhiidae), nuthatches (Sittidae), and flycatchers (Tyrannidae) are thought to be predators on the western pine beetle.

Predation by woodpeckers reduced the western pine beetle population by (a) actual consumption of 31.8% in two generations studied, and (b) by increasing parasite densities in the order of 3.85 factor. The increase in parasite density was believed to have been caused by bark removal to a near uniform thickness enabling a higher parasitism by those parasites with short ovipositors, such as Cecidostiba and Roptrocerus spp.

One adverse effect of woodpecker predation was a reduction or a depression of insect predation. Highly mobile insect predators may have been driven away by woodpecker activity, actually consumed, or both.

Bark flakes, chipped or pried off by the woodpeckers during their feeding activity, contained but few insects and it is doubtful that these could survive on the ground and reach the adult stage.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 11 , November 1965 , pp. 1184 - 1199
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amman, G. D. 1958. A comparative study of methods for censusing woodpeckers in spruce-fir forests of Colorado. M. S. Thesis, Colo. State Univ., 125 pp.Google Scholar
Amman, G. D., and Baldwin, P. H.. 1960. A comparison of methods for censusing woodpeckers in spruce-fir forests of Colorado. Ecology 41: 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, P. H. 1960. Overwintering of woodpeckers in bark beetle-infested spruce-fir forests of Colorado. Proc. 12 int. Ornith. Congr., Helsinki (1958): 71–84.Google Scholar
Beal, F. E. L. 1910. Birds of California in relation to the fruit industry. U.S. Dep. Agric. biol. Survey Bull. 34: 1–96.Google Scholar
Beal, F. E. L. 1911. Food of the woodpeckers of the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. biol. Survey Bull. 37: 1–64.Google Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1964a. Identification of insect inclusions in x-rays of ponderosa pine infested by western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte. Canad. Ent. 96: 883–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1964b. Insect predators of the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte, with particular reference to the clerid, Enoclerus lecontei Wolcott. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Calif., Berkeley, 222 pp.Google Scholar
Berryman, A. A., and Stark, R. W.. 1962. Radiography in forest entomology. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 55: 456–466.Google Scholar
Bruns, H. 1960. The economic importance of birds in forests. Bird Study 7: 193–208.Google Scholar
Burt, W. H. 1930. Adaptive modification in woodpeckers. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 32: 455–524.Google Scholar
Franz, J. M. 1961. Biological control of pest insects in Europe. Annu. Rev. Ent. 6: 183–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillmeister, H. J. 1963. Eight years of practical bird protection in Berlin Forests. Allg. Forstz. 18: 470–471.Google Scholar
Haartman, L. von. 1957. Adaptation in hole nesting birds. Evolution 11: 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, P. H. T. 1948. The assessment of the food of birds. Ibis 90: 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, F. T. 1951. The effect of woodpeckers on the Engelmann spruce beetle, Dendroctonus engelmanni Hopkins. M.S. Thesis, Colo. State Univ., 73 pp.Google Scholar
Knight, F. B. 1958. The effects of woodpeckers on populations of the Engelmann spruce beetle. J. econ. Ent. 51: 603–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowlton, G. F., and Stains, G. S.. 1943. Flickers eat injurious insects. Canad. Ent. 75: 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koersveld, E. von. 1950. Difficulties in stomach analysis. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ornith. Uppsala, Stockholm, pp. 592–594.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, J. M. D. 1948. Birds and silvicultural systems. Quart. J. For. 42: 89–92.Google Scholar
Martin, A. C. 1949. Procedures in wildlife food studies. U.S. Dep. Agric. Fish & Wildl. Serv., Wildl. Leafl. 325, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Massey, C. L., and Wygant, N. D.. 1954. Biology and control of the Engelmann spruce beetle in Colorado. U.S. Dep. Agric. Circ. 944, 35 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, T. M., and Keen, F. P.. 1960. Biology and control of the western pine beetle. U.S. Dep. of Agric., Misc. Publ. 800, 381 pp.Google Scholar
Moanjen, J., Candido de Carvallo, J., and de Souza Lopes, H.. 1941. Observatoes sobre o contendo gastrico das aves brasileiras. Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz 36: 405–445.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1959. Single-factor analysis in population dynamics. Ecology 40: 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otvos, I. S. 1964. Studies on avian predators of Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) with special reference to Picidae. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, 69 pp.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. T. 1961. A field guide to western birds. Houghton Miflin Co., Boston, The Riverside Press, 366 pp.Google Scholar
Popelov, S. M. 1956. The economic significance of woodpeckers in the forests of the Leningrad region. Translated from Zool. J. 35: 600–605.Google Scholar
Poznanin, L. P. 1946. On the hollowing activity of woodpeckers. C. R. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. 54: 189–191.Google Scholar
Richardson, F. 1942. Adaptive modification for tree trunk foraging in birds. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 46: 317–368.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. B. 1962. A device for measuring the oviposition potential of a bark beetle parasite. Canad. Ent. 94: 737–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampert, H. 1965. Personal communication. Lecturer in Forestry and Forest Manager for the School of Forestry, University of California.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopff, J. 1955. On the hearing of birds. Auk 72: 340–347.Google Scholar
Semenov, S. M. 1956. The nesting of the great spotted woodpecker in artificial nests. Proc. Conf. on “Ways and Means of Using Birds in Combating Noxious Insects,” pp. 78–79. (Translated from Russian.)Google Scholar
Skutch, A. P. 1943. Family life of Central American woodpeckers. Sci. Monthly 56: 358–364.Google Scholar
Stallcup, P. L. 1963. A method for investigating avian predation on the adult Black Hills beetle. M.S. Thesis, Colo. State Univ.Google Scholar
Stark, R. W. 1965. Population dynamics of the western pine beetle. Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Proj. 1778. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
Sweetman, H. L. 1958. The principles of biological control, pp. 383–389. W. M. C. Brown Co., Dubuque, Iowa.Google Scholar
Thatcher, R. C. 1960. Bark beetles affecting southern pines. Southern For. Exp. Sta. Occasional Paper 180.Google Scholar
Tunnock, S. 1962. Progress report, mountain pine beetle studies. Unpublished report, USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Missoula, Montana.Google Scholar
Yeager, L. E. 1955. Two woodpecker populations in relation to environmental change. Condor 57: 148–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziller, W. G., and Stirling, D.. 1961. Sapsucker damage in coastal B. C. Forest Chron. 37: 331–335.Google Scholar