Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:24:28.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTRIBUTIONS TO A KNOWLEDGE OF THE LARVAL ELATERIDAE (COLEOPTERA): NO. 3; AGRIOTES ESCH. AND DALOPIUS ESCH.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert Glen
Robert Glen
Affiliation:
Dominion Entomological Laboratory, Saskatoon, Sask.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As our knowledge of the larvae increases, the fundamental differences between Agriotes Eschscholtz and Dalopius Eschscholtz become more apparent. However, the larval characters hitherto used to separate the genera are now known to be quite inadequate.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , April 1944 , pp. 73 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beling, Th. 1883–1884. Beitrag zur Metamorphose der Käferfamilie der Elateriden: Deutsche ent. Zeit. Berlin. Bd. 27 (1883), pp. 123–144, 257–304; Bd. 28 (1884), pp. 177–216.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W. S. 1910. The Coleoptera of Indiana: Bull. 1, Ind. Dept. Geol. and N. H., Nature Pub. Co. Indianapolis, Ind.Google Scholar
Brouwn, W. J. 1931. The Amerikan species of Dalopius Esch. (Elateridae, Coleop.): Can. Ent. vol. 66, pp. 30–39, 66–72, 87–96, 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comstock, J. H., and Slingerland, M. V. 1891. Wireworms: Bull. 33, Ent. Div. Cornell Agr. Expt. Sta., N. Y., pp. 192–275, illus.Google Scholar
Forbes, S. A. 1892. Wireworms: In Eighteenth report of the state entomologist on the noxious and beneficial insects of the state of Illinois for the year 1891–1892. Ill. State Jour. Co., 1920, pp. 24–44. illus. (Reprinted by authority of the Stare of Ill. Springfield, Ill., 1920).Google Scholar
Ghilarov, M. S. 1937. The fauna of injurions soil insects of arable land: Bull. Ent. Res. vol. 28. pt, 4, pp. 653–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glen, R. 1931. The esternal morphology and the characters separating the elaterid larvae of Saskatchewan; a preliminary suidy: Report to Can. Div. Ent., and to Univ. Sask. (M.Sc. Thesis), 118 pp. (typed), illus., May 1931.Google Scholar
Glen, R. 1941. Contributions to rhe morphology of the larval Elateridae (Coleoptera); No. 2, Agriotes limosus LeConte: Can. Ent. vol. 73, pp. 57–62, illus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glen, R., King, K. M., and Arnason, A. P. 1943. The identification of wireworms of economic importance in Canada: Can. Jour. Res., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 358–387, illus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorham, R. P. 1924. Notes on Agriotes mancus Say at Dartmouth, N.S.: Proc. Acadian Ent. Soc. 1923, no. 9, pp. 69–72, Truro.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. H. 1928. Wireworms affecting Maine Agriculture: Me. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 343, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. H. 1936. The bionomics and control of wireworms in Maine: Me. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 381. 146 pp., illus.Google Scholar
Henriksen, K. L. 1911. Oversigt over de danske Elateride larver (Danish with English summary): Entom. Medd. vol. 4, pp. 225–331, illus.Google Scholar
Horst, A. 1922. Zur Kenntnis der Biologie und Morphologie einiger Elateriden und ihrer Larven (Insbesondere Untersuchungen uber Agriotes obscurus L.): Arch. Naturgesch., vol. 88, pp. 1–90, illus.Google Scholar
King, K. M. 1928. Economic importance of wireworms and false wireworms in Saskatchewan: Sci. Agric., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 693–706.Google Scholar
Kuwayama, S. 1937. Chafers or scarabacid beetles and their relation to agriculture [In Japanese]: Hokkaido Agric. Expt. Sta., Bull. No. 61, 73 pp., illus.Google Scholar
Leng, C. W. 1920. Catalogue of the Coleoptera of Amerita, north of Mexico: John D. Sherman, Jr., Mt. Vernon, N. Y.Google Scholar
Pettit, J. 1872. Description of the wheat wireworm Agriotes mancus Say: Can. Ent. vol. 4, pp. 3–6, illus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlins, W. A. 1934. Experimental studies on the wheat wireworm, Agriotes mancus Say: Jour. Econ. Ent. vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlins, W. A. 1940. Biology and control of the wheat wireworm, Agriotes mancus Say: Cornell Univ. Agric. Expt. Sta. Bull. 738, 30 pp., illus., Ithaca, N. Y.Google Scholar
Ridgway, R. 1912. Color standards and nomenclature: Pub. by the author, Wash., D. C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A. W. R. 1922. On the life-history of “wireworms” of the genus Agriotes Esch., with some notes on that of Athous haemorrhoidalis F., Part III: Ann. App. Biol. vol. 9, nos. 3. and 4, pp. 306–324, illus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, E. H. 1926. Wireworms of Alberta: Univ. of Alta. Res. Bull. No. 2, 17 pp., illus.Google Scholar
Subklew, W. 1934. Agriotes lineatus L. und Agriotes obscurus L. (ein Beitrag zu ihrer Morphologie und Biologie): Zeit. Angew. Ent. Bd. 21, pp. 96–122, illus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. A. 1941. The Elateridae of Pennsylvania: Jour. N. Y. Ent. Soc. vol. 49, pp. 233–263.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, E. C. 1932. Miscellaneous studies in the Elateridae and related families of Coleoptera: Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci., 4th Ser., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 291–465.Google Scholar
Znamensky, A. V. 1927. Instructions for carrying out observations on the entomofauna of the soil [In Russian]: Trudui Poltavsk. S-Kh. Opuitn. Stantz. [Trans. Poltava Agric. Expt. Sta.] no. 51, Ent. Div. no. 14, 58 pp., illus. Kiev.Google Scholar