^{page 116 note b} bene] byth. A.

^{page 116 note c} they to calle “yn ther ffirst article of these compleynts called Seynt Stephyns Fee and nowe otherwise they callyth the Bisshoppes fee shalbe, &c.” A.

^{page 117 note a} yn] omitted in A.

^{page 117 note b} seide] same. A.

^{page 118 note a} seide] omitted in A.

^{page 118 note b} and to aboveseide] omitted. A.

^{page 118 note c} Bishop] omitted. A.

^{page 118 note d} bothen] both. A.

^{page 118 note e} On a rider occur extracts from Domesday relating to houses in Exeter which pay custom to the King, viz.: “Terra episcopi de Exonia. Episcopus, de Exonia habet in civitate unam ecclesiam que reddit j marcam argenti et xlvij. domos reddentes xs. xd. et due domus sunt vastate per ignem. Ibi due acre terre et dimidia et jacent cum terra Burgensium que ad eccliam pertinent. Ipse episcopus tenet in Excestria ix. domos reddentes iijs.” Also “Terra Episcopi Constantiensis—Ecclesia Batailze—Terra Comitis Moritonie — Terra Baldwini Vicecomitis — Terra Radulfi Pomeray — Terra Alveredi — Terra Godeboldi,”—with this note : “The whiche alle churchis housys londys and tenementis buth of oo holdyng as well as ryght meny moo other and dyverse whiche alle passyth the nombre of lx. and moo beryng rente or yeldyng custume as all apperith of recorde yn the seyd boke, none wythseyd except the xlvij. housys aboveseyd now late ; the whiche the Mayer and Comminalte seyn that all buth parcell of the seyd Cytee yn and of and annexid to the same. And they seyn that all the rentys aforseyd ben parcell of the fe ferme of the said Cyte, and that rentys and custumys proveth a fe ferme by prescripcion at that tyme. And the Cyte not yn the Kinges hondes as hit ys yn theire seconde Article of provis supposid.”

^{page 119 note a} fee ferme. A.

^{page 120 note a} Justices of an eyer. A.

^{page 120 note b} Richardus] Rex. MS.

^{page 121 note a} and leyd] omitted. A.

^{page 121 note b} al] omitted. A.

^{page 121 note c} graunted] omitted. A.

^{page 122 note a} seide] omitted. A.

^{page 122 note b} The to buth] and is sufficient to prove that they byth nott. A.

^{page 122 note c} and to wisdomys] omitted. A.

^{page 123 note a} of to tenementys] omitted. A.

^{page 123 note b} the] and the. A.

^{page 123 note c} yn] as yn. A.

^{page 124 note a} that to seyn] omitted. A.

^{page 124 note b} they to 'tc.] which is well proved yn the first article of provys ; A. which ends here.