^{page 293 note 1} Papers concerning the Daily Telegraph Incident, Bodleian Library, Oxford, MS. Eng. hist. d. 256. All manuscripts and typescripts of the years 1907–8 mentioned in the footnotes to Appendix A are in this collection. Mr Alan Palmer has used the documents in the collection for his account of the incident in The Kaiser (1978)Google Scholar, from which I have greatly profited.

^{page 293 note 2} Montagu-Stuart-Wortley to Editor, 7 July 1930, Daily Telegraph, 8 07 1930.Google Scholar

^{page 293 note 3} Palmer, , op. cit., p. 129.Google Scholar

^{page 293 note 4} Tyrrell, to Montagu-Stuart-Wortley, Violet, 8 11 1907.Google Scholar

^{page 294 note 1} I have been unable to identify with certainty the author of the endorsement. It may, however, have well been Montagu-Stuart-Wortley's daughter, Louise, wife of Sir Percy Loraine.

^{page 294 note 2} Montagu-Stuart-Wortley's movements can be deduced from his letter of 1 Dec. to his wife, quoted below.

^{page 294 note 3} Ibid; see also below.

^{page 294 note 4} Ibid.

^{page 295 note 1} Ibid.

^{page 295 note 2} Rodd, J. R., Social and Diplomatic Memories, 1902–1919 (1925), p. 101.Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 3} Montagu-Stuart-Wortley to his wife, 2 Dec. 1907.

^{page 295 note 4} Montagu-Stuart-Wortley to his wife, 7 Dec. 1907.

^{page 295 note 5} August zu Eulenburg to Montagu-Stuart-Wortley, 14 June 1908.

^{page 295 note 6} Daily Telegraph, 8 07 1930.Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 7} Montagu-Stuart-Wortley to Wilhelm II, 23 Sept. 1908 (copy); Wilhelm II to Montagu-Stuart-Wortley, 15 Oct. 1908.

^{page 296 note 1} Daily Telegraph, 8 07 1930Google Scholar. The role ascribed by Montagu-Stuart-Wortley to Firth has been attributed by several historians to Harold Spender. However, there seems to be no reason to doubt Montagu-Stuart-Wortley's statement concerning Firth, who was a member of the staff of the Daily Telegraph both in 1908 and 1930.

^{page 296 note 2} Typescript, undated, MS. Eng. hist. d. 256, f. 43.

^{page 296 note 3} For a good account of what happened to the typescript in Germany see Cecil, L., The German Diplomatic Service 1871–1914 (Princeton, 1976), p. 304Google Scholar, to which I am much indebted.

^{page 296 note 4} The typescript bears a number of corrections in ink, presumably made by Klehmet, and a few minor ones in pencil, in the handwriting of Montagu-Stuart-Wortley.

^{page 296 note 5} Wilhelm II to Montagu-Stuart-Wortley, 15 Oct. 1908.

^{page 297 note 1} Lawson, to Montagu-Stuart-Wortley, , 28 10 1908.Google Scholar