Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2009
It is a common assumption in ethics that everyone is due equal access to basic human goods. In our modern society, at least since the French Revolution, healthcare is counted along with food, shelter, and security as such a basic good. Anyone suffering from a treatable life-threatening disease can therefore, be seen as having a prima facie claim on medical treatment.
1. Foot, P. Virtues and Vices. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978: 43.Google Scholar
2. Daniels, N. Health care needs and distributive justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1981; 10: 146–55.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Daniels, N. Equity of access to health care: Some conceptual and ethical issues. Milbank Memorial Fund Quartely/Health and Society 1982; 60: 51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Brody, BA. Health care for the haves and have-nots: towards a just basis of distribution. In: Schelp, E, ed. Justice and Health Care. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1981.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Veatch, RM. What is ‘just’ health care delivery?. In: Veatch, RM, Branson, R, eds. Ethics and Health Policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1976: 131–42.Google Scholar
6. Fried, C. Equality and rights in medical care. Hastings Center Report 1976; 6: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Veatch, R. Allocating organs by utilitraianism is seen as favoring whites over blacks. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Newsletter 1989; 3: 1–3.Google Scholar
8. Shaw, BW, Wood, RP, Stratta, RJ, et al. . Stratifying the causes of death in liver transplant recipients. Archives of Surgery 1989; 124: 895–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Weinstein, MC, Stason, WB. Allocating resources: the case of hypertension. Hasting Center Report 1977; 7: 24–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar