Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T05:53:51.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Status of Rules of Precedent: A Brief Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Jim Evans
Get access

Extract

I am grateful to Laurence Goldstein and the editor for allowing me this opportunity to make a brief reply to those parts of Goldstein's article which discuss my own earlier article.

Type
Articles
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , April 1984 , pp. 108 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “The Status of Rules of Precedent” [1982] C.L.J. 162.Google Scholar

2 “Four Alleged Paradoxes in Legal Reasoning” [1979] C.L.J. 373, 389.Google Scholar