Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:26:13.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Positive Economics and the Normativistic Fallacy: Bridging the Two Sides of CSR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Philipp Schreck ,
Dominik van Aaken  and
Thomas Donaldson
Philipp Schreck
Affiliation:
University of Munich
Dominik van Aaken
Affiliation:
University of Munich
Thomas Donaldson
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In response to criticism of empirical or “positive” approaches to corporate social responsibility (CSR), we defend the importance of these approaches for any CSR theory that seeks to have practical impact. Although we acknowledge limitations to positive approaches, we unpack the neglected but crucial relationships between positive knowledge on the one hand and normative knowledge on the other in the implementation of CSR principles. Using the structure of a practical syllogism, we construct a model that displays the key role of empirical knowledge in fulfilling a firm’s responsibility to society, paying special attention to the implications of the “ought implies can” dictum. We also defend the importance of one particular class of empirical claims; namely, claims from the field of economics. Even positive economic theory, which is often criticized for endorsing profits rather than values, can cooperate in intriguing ways with non-economic concepts in the implementation of CSR goals.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibilitypractical syllogismpositive economicsnormative ethicspolitical CSRphilosophy of science
Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 297 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22: 45–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2008.35590353Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1925/1998. The Nicomachean ethics, trans. Ross, W.D.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R., 1981. The emergence of cooperation among egoists. The American Political Science Review, 75: 306–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1961366Google Scholar
Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. 2003. Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12: 419–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105864003322309536Google Scholar
Balzer, W., Moulines, C.U., & Sneed, J.D. 1987. An architectonic for science: the structuralist approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3765-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzer, W., Sneed, J.D., & Moulines, C.U.(Eds.). 2000. Structuralist knowledge representation: paradigmatic examples. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S.B., 2003. Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24: 143–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S.R. 2007. Corporations, democracy, and the public good. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16: 201–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492607305891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M.L., & King, A.A. 2008. Good fences make good neighbours: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 1150–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492607305891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, D.P. 2001. Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10: 7–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105864001300122548Google Scholar
Baron, D.P. 2009. A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18: 7–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00206.xGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L., Bowie, N.E., & Arnold, D.G. (Eds.) 2009. Ethical theory and business (8th ed.) Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1993. Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. The Journal of Political Economy, 101: 385–W9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirlaen, M. 2011. Ethical consistency and the logic of ought. Theoretical & Applied Ethics, 1: 45–51.Google Scholar
Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. 2007. Retailing public goods: the economics of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics, 91: 1645–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjpubeco.2007.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biedermann, R., 2006. From a weak letter of intent to prevalence: The toy industries’ code of conduct. Journal of Public Affairs, 6: 197–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjpubeco.2007.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, M.M., & Stout, L.A. 1999. Team production in business organizations: An introduction. Journal of Corporation Law, 24: 743.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1980. The methodology of positive economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonardi, J.-P., Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. 2005. The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30: 397–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.16387895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borck, J.C., & Coglianese, C. 2009. Voluntary environmental programs: Assessing their effectiveness. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34: 305–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.032908.091450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, H.R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bowie, N., & Dunfee, T. 2002. Confronting morality in markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 38: 381–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016080107462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie,N.E. ,N.E. 1999. Business ethics: A Kantian perspective.Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bowie, N.E. 2002. A Kantian approach to business ethics In Frederick, R.A. (Ed.), A companion to business ethics: 3–16. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brennan, G. & Buchanan, J.M. 1985. The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, T.J., & Dacin, P.A. 1997. The company and the product: corporate Associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61: 68–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. 1987. Constitutional economics In Newman, P., Eatwell, J. & Milgate, M. (Ed.), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics: 1: 585–88.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.L. 1989. Corporations, collective organization, and the state: Industry response to the accident at Three Mile Island. Social Science Quarterly, 70: 650–66.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.L. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32: 946–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A.B. 2008. A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices In Crane, A.McWilliams, D.Moon, J. & Siegel, D.S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: 19–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, C.R., & Jennings, M.M. 2002. Social responsibility and supply chain relationships. Transportation Research Part E, 38: 37–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00008-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmann, P. 2000. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 663–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bakker, F.G., Groenewegen, P. & Hond, F.d. 2005. A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance Business & Society, 44: 283–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deetz, S. 1996. Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy Organization Science, 7: 191–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhaliwal, D.S., Li, O.Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y.G. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reportingce The Accounting Review, 86: 59–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doh, J.P., Howton, S.D., Howton, S.W., & Siegel, D.S. 2010. Does the market respond to endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information, and legitimacy Journal of Management, 36: 1461–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206309337896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1994. When integration fails: The logic of prescription and description in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 157–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. 2012. The epistemic fault line in corporategovernance. Academy of Management Review, 37: 256–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. & Dunfee, T.W. 1994. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19: 252–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. & Dunfee, T.W. 1999. Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.L. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. . Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B., & Sen, S. 2007. Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24: 224–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jijresmar.2007.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunfee, T.W. & Donaldson, T. 2002a. Social contract approaches to business ethics: Bridging the “is-ought” gap. In R. A. Frederick (Ed.), A Companion to Business Ethics. 38–55. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dunfee, T.W. & Donaldson, T. 2002b. In Bowie, N. (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to business ethics. 61–76. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. 2002. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability Business Strategy & the Environment, 11: 130–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jijresmar.2007.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R.H. 1996. Can socially responsible firms survive in a competitive environment? In Messick, D.M. & Tenbrunsel, A.E. (Ed.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. 86–103. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Frankena, W.K. 1939. The naturalistic fallacy. Mind, 48: 464–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/XLVIII.192.464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, W.C. 1994. From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & Society, 33: 150–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765039403300202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1953. The methodology of positive economics In Friedman, M. (Ed.), Essays in positive economics. 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. (September 13): 32.Google Scholar
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. 2004. Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53: 51–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B.& Hansen, J.M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis Strategic Management Journal, 30: 425–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gond, J.-P. & Matten, D. 2007. Rethinking the business-society interfact: Beyond the functionalist trap ICCSR Research Paper Series No. 47-2007. Nottingham.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Palazzo, G.& Basu, K. 2009. Reconsidering instrumental corporate social responsibility through the Mafia metaphor. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19: 57–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20091913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodpaster, K.E. 1985. Business ethics, ideology, and thenaturalistic fallacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 4: 227–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00381763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodpaster, K.E. 2010. Corporate responsibility and its constituents In Brenkert, G.G. & Beauchamp, T.L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics. 127–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, S. 1991. The history and philosophy of social science London. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203423226Google Scholar
Grant, R.W., & Keohane, R.O. 2005. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics American Political Science Review, 99: 21–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R.M., & Donovan, A. 2010. The methods of business ethics. In Brenkert, G.G., & Beauchamp, T.L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics, 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greening, D.W., & Turban, D.B. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39: 254–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, F.H. & Hollis, M. 1979. Philosophy and economic theory. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J.D., & Freeman, R.E. 2008. The impossibility of the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18: 541–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S.L. 1995. A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20: 986–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heal, G. 2005. Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C.G., & Oppenheim, P. 1948. Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15: 135–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/286983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D. 2001. Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: What's the bottom line. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125–39.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150/>3.0.CO;2-H3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A.J., Keim, G.D., & Schuler, D. 2004. Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30: 837–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, W.M. 1991. Business and environmental ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1: 169–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, M. 1994. The philosophy of social science: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homann, K. 1999. Die Relevanz der Ökonomik fürdie Implementation ethischer Zielsetzungen In Baumgartner, A.Franz, H. & Genosko, J. (Eds.), Handbuch der Wirtschaftsethik, Vol.1: Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Homann, K. 2002. Ökonomik: Fortsetzung der Ethik mit anderen Mitteln In Lütge, C. (Ed.), Vorteile und Anreize, 243–66. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Homann, K. 2007. Globalisation from a business ethics point of view In Homann, K. & Christoph, L. (Eds.), Globalisation and business ethics, 3–10. Alder-shot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Homann, K. & Blome-Drees, F. 1992. Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Homann, K. & Pies, I. 1994. Wirtschaftsethik in der Moderne: Zur ökonomischen Theorie der Moral. Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, 5: 3–14.Google Scholar
Ingram, P., & Clay, K. 2000. The choice-within-constraints new institutionalism and implicationsfor sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.L525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M.C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12: 235–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kekes, J. 1984. “Ought implies can” and twokinds of morality. The Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 459–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2219064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, A.J. 1966. Practical inference. Analysis, 26: 65–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3326284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J.N. 1917. The scope and method of political economy (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
King, A.A.Lenox, M.J. & Terlaak, A. 2005. The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 1091–1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, B.G., & Soule, A. 2007. Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 413–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish-Gephart, J.J., Harrison, D.A., & Treviño, L.K. 2010. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 1–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klassen, R.D., & Whybark, D.C. 1999. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 599–615. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurucz, E.C., Colbert, B.A., & Wheeler, D. 2008. The business case for corporate social responsibility. In Cranen, A.McWilliams, A.Matten, D. & Moon, J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, 83–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, D., Lee, P.M., & Dai, Y. 2011. Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management, 37: 153–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390963Google Scholar
Laufer, W.S. 2003. Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics 43: 253–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022962719299Google Scholar
Lazear, E.P. 2000. Economic imperialism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 99–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355300554683Google Scholar
Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. 2010. Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, C. 2009. “Ought,” “can,” and practical reasons. American Philosophical Quarterly, 46: 363–72.Google Scholar
Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 115 –36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00585.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R.A., Barber, A.E., & Hillman, A.J. 2001. Good deeds and misdeeds: A mediated model of the effect of corporate social performance on organizational attractiveness. Business & Society, 40: 397 –415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. 2010. Global value chains, local collective action and corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical evidence. Business Strategy & the Environment, 19: 1 –13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C.B. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, andmarket value. Journal of Marketing, 70: 1 –18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B., & Barney, J.B. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32: 817 –35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. 2001. People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268 –305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3556659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, C., Glynn, M.A., & Davis, G.F. 2007. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32: 925 –45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matten, D., & Moon, J. 2008. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33: 404 –24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, J.W., Lyon, T.P., & Hackett, S.C. 2000. Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics, 43: 583 –618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, T. 1999. The domain of hypotheses and the realism of assumptions. Journal of Economic Methodology, 6: 319 –30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501789900000021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 117 –27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menger, C. 1985. Investigations into the method of the social sciences with special reference to economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Messick, D.M. 1999. Alternative logics for decision making in social settings. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39: 11 –28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00023-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misangyi, V.F., Weaver, G.R., & Elms, H. 2008. Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33: 750 –70. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.32465769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D.B., & Ramus, C.A. 2007. Including corporate social responsibility, environmental sustainability, and ethics in calibrating MBA job preferences. Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 1981 Stanford.Google Scholar
Moore, G.E. 1903/1993. Principia ethica: (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mothersill, M. 1962. Anscombe’s account of the practical syllogism. The Philosophical Review, 71: 448 –61. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2183457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, P. 1988. Why do corporations give to charity?. Journal of Business, 61: 65 –93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/296420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. 1985. Aristotle’s de motu animalium. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, J. 1988. Self-love, self-interest and the rational economic agent. Analyse & Kritik, 20: 184 –204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlitzky, M. 2011. Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21: 409 –44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq201121325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peloza, J. 2006. Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48: 52 –72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pies, I., Hielscher, S., & Beckmann, M. 2009. Moral commitments and the societal role of business: An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19: 375 –401. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200919322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portney, P.R. 2008. The (not so) new corporate social responsibility: An empirical perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2: 261 –75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. 2005. Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms' regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49: 235 –48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00120.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, F.L., & Stavins, R.N. 2010. Corporate social responsibility, business strategy, and the environment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26: 164 –81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grq008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, F.L., Stavins, R.N., & Vietor, R.H.K. 2008. Corporate social responsibility through an economic lens. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2: 219 –39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordan, C.M., Gatewood, R.D., & Barnes, B. 1997. Corporate image: Employees reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 16: 401 –12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017989205184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. 2003. The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 10: 249 –65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508403010002004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacconi, L. 2011. A Rawlsian view of CSR and the game theory of its implementation (part 1): The multistakeholder model of corporate governance. In Sacconi, L.Blair, M.Freeman, R.E. & Vercelli, A. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: The contribution of economic theory and related disciplines: 157. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A.G., & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1096 –1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26585837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A.G., & Palazzo, G. 2008. Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In Crane, A.Mc-Williams, A.Matten, D.Moon, J. & Siegel, D.S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: 413 –31. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0018Google Scholar
Scherer, A.G., & Palazzo, G. 2011. The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 899 –931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. 2006. Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 505 –32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200616446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuler, D.A., & Christmann, P. 2011. The effectiveness of market-based social governance schemes: The case of fair trade coffee. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21: 133 –56. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20112116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M.S., & Carroll, A.B. 2008. Integrating and unifying competing and complementary frameworks: The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business & Society, 47: 148 –86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650306297942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, D.S. 2009. Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/ strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 5 –16. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2009.43479260Google Scholar
Siemens, AG 2012. Collective Action.Google Scholar
Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Wai Fong, C. 2009. Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Accounting Review, 84: 937 –67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sison, A.J.G. 2008. Corporate governance and ethics: An Aristotelian perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R.C. 2002. Business ethics and virtue. In Frederick, R.A. (Ed.), A companion to business ethics: 30 –37. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stoeckl, N. 2004. The private costs and benefits of environmental self-regulation: Which firms have most to gain? Business Strategy and the Environment, 13: 135 –55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streumer, B. 2007. Reasons and impossibility Philosophical Studies, 136: 351 –84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-4282-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchanek, A. 2001. Ökonomische Ethik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Suchanek, A. 2004. What is meant by consent? In van Aaken, A.List, C. & Luetge, C. (Ed.), Deliberation and decision: A dialogue between economics, constitutional theory, and deliberative democracy: 169 –80. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Swanson, D.L. 1995. Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20: 43 –64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, M.T. 1982. Aristotelian practical reason. Mind, 91: 57 –76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCI.361.57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transparency International. 2008. Policy position #5/2008: Enhancing revenue transparency in oil & gas company reporting. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
Transparency International. 2009. Business principles for countering bribery: A multi-stakeholder initia-tive led by Transparency International (2nd ed.). Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
Treviño, L.K., & Weaver, G.R. 1994. Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two?. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 113 –28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L.K., Weaver, G.R., & Reynolds, S.J. 2006. Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32: 951 –90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, P. 2009. Integrative economic ethics: Foundations of a civilized market economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Aaken, D., Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. 2013. Why do corporate actors engage in pro-social activities? A Bourdieusian approach to corporate social responsibility. Organization. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oosterhout, J.H. 2010. The role of corporations in shaping the global rules of the game: In search of new foundations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20: 253 –64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq201020218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, V.J. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and the “game of catallaxy”: The perspective of constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 18: 199 –222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10602-007-9022-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, V.J., & Buchanan, J.M. 1988. Rational choice and moral order. Analyse & Kritik, 10: 138 –60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D.J. 2005. The market for virtue:. The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
von Wright, G.H. 1963. Practical inference. The Philosophical Review, 72: 159 –79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2183102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Wright, G.H. 1971. Explanation and understanding New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vranas, P.B.M. 2007. CI ought, therefore I can. Philosophical Studies, 136: 167 –216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9071-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, A.C., & Freeman, R.E. 1988. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9: 123 –40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, O.F. 2004. The UN global compact: The challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14: 755 –74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200414432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windsor, D. 2001. The future of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9: 225 –56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb028934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windsor, D. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 93 –114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00584.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16: 691 –718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar