Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T18:41:10.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Princeton Companion to Mathematics, edited by Timothy Gowers (June Barrow-Green and Imre Leader, associate editors), Princeton University Press, 2008, 1008 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2014

Juliette Kennedy*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, [email protected].

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 p. ix.

2 The Essence of Mathematics” in Newman, J. R. (ed.) The World of Mathematics, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1956 Google Scholar.

3 p. 155.

4 as described by Hodges, Wilfrid in “What is a Structure Theory,” Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, (1987), vol. 19, 209237 Google Scholar. Shelah's abstract announcing the final step of the proof was called Why am I so happy?”, Abstracts Amer. Math. Soc., 3 (1982), 282 Google Scholar.

5 p. 928.

6 Ibid.

7 Ibid.

8 p. 931.

9 p. 933.

10 p. 934.

11 p. 931.

12 Harris has written about 5 philosophical papers out of a total of 70. The remainder are mostly in the area of number theory.

13 p. 973.

14 p. 970. Italics the reviewer's.

15 p. 969.

16 p. 971. Harris is quoting from Corfield's, David Towards a Philosophy of Real Mathematics, Oxford 2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 p. 971. Harris is quoting from Hacking's, Ian Historical Ontology, Harvard, 2002 Google Scholar.

18 p. 971.

19 p. 966.

20 p. 972.

21 Many of the above-cited remarks, as well as those of a similar critical nature, are a somewhat disparate collection of citations from the literature. It is therefore perhaps not entirely clear what the specifics of Harris's own criticism amounts to.

22 p. 21, Theories and Things, Harvard 1981 Google Scholar.

23 p. 973.