Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:07:36.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution, life history, host specificity and suitability of an undescribed Chrysolina species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) for the biological control of Chrysanthemoides monilifera (Compositae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. J. Adair*
Affiliation:
Keith Turnbull Research Institute, Department of Conservation and Environment, Frankston, Australia
J. K. Scott
Affiliation:
CSIRO Biological Control Unit, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
*
Keith Turnbull Research Institute, Department of Conservation and Environment, P.O. Box 48, Frankston, 3199Australia.

Abstract

In host specificity tests using 81 plant species from 27 families, an undescribed Chrysolina sp. completed its development only on Chrysanthemoides monilifera, a serious weed of native vegetation in Australia. Minor exploratory feeding, mostly by adults, occurred on 35 plant species. The Chrysolina sp. is restricted to the eastern Cape Province of South Africa where it occurs on Chrysanthemoides m. pisifera, a subspecies not yet recorded in Australia. Chrysanthemoides m. monilifera and C. m. rotundata, both naturalized in Australia, were accepted as hosts by Chrysolina sp., but adult emergence was lower on the latter subspecies. A climate comparison between a site location for Chrysolina sp. and stations within the Australian distribution of Chrysanthemoides monilifera has identified potential release sites that may be suitable for the insect. Chrysolina sp. was approved for release in Australia in 1989 and releases were initiated in 1990.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acocks, J.P.H. (1975) Veld types of South Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Society of South Africa 40, 1120.Google Scholar
Adair, R.J. & Scott, J.K. (1989) The life history and host specificity of Comostolopsis germana Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), a biological control agent of Chrysanthemoides monilifera (Compositae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 79, 649657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annecke, D.P. & Moran, V.C. (1982) Insects and mites of cultivated plants in South Africa. 383 pp. Durban and Pretoria, Butterworths.Google Scholar
Beadle, N.C.W. & Beadle, L.D. (1980) Students flora of North Eastern New South Wales. Parts 1-1V, 686 pp. University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar
Dodkin, M. & Gilmore, A.M. (1985) Species and ecosystems at risk - a preliminary review, pp. 3352in Love, A. & Dyson, R. (Eds) Proceedings of a conference on Chrysanthemoides monilifera, Port Macquarie, 8–9 August 1984. National Parks and Wildlife Service and NSW Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Forbes, S.J. & Ross, J.H. (1988) A census of the vascular plants of Victoria. 2nd edn.192 pp. National Herbarium of Victoria, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Gibbs Russell, G.E., Welman, W.G., Retief, E., Immelman, K.L., Germishuizen, G., Pienaar, B.J., Van Wyk, M. & Nicholas, A. (1987) List of southern African plants. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa 56,1270.Google Scholar
Gray, M. (1976) Miscellaneous notes on Australian plants. 2. Chrysanthemoides (Asteraceae). Contributions from Herbarium Australiense 16, 15.Google Scholar
Hartmann, M.O. (1988) The soils of eastern Cape. pp. 3743in Bruton, M.N. and Gess, F W. (Eds) Towards an environment plan for the eastern Cape. Grahamstown, Rhodes University.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, H. & Pimentel, D. (1984) New approach for selecting biological control agents. Canadian Entomologist 116, 11091121.Google Scholar
Jessop, J.P. & Toelken, H.R. (1986) Flora of South Australia. Parts 1-1V, 2248 pp. South Australian Government Printing Division, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Kopke, D. (1988) The climate of the eastern Cape. pp. 4452in Bruton, M.N. and Gess, F.W. (Eds) Towards an environment plan for the eastern Cape. Grahamstown, Rhodes University.Google Scholar
Mabberley, D.J. (1987) The plant-book, a portable dictionary of the higher plants. 706 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moll, E.J. & Bossi, L. (1984) Assessment of the extent of the natural vegetation of the fynbos biome of South Africa. South African Journal of Science 80, 355358.Google Scholar
Norlindh, T. (1943) Studies in the Calenduleae. I. Monograph of the genera Dimorphotheca, Castalis, Osteospermum, Gibbana and Chrysanthemoides. 423 pp. Lund, C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Palgrave, K.C. (1977) Compositae. p. 913in Moll, E.J. (Ed) Trees of southern Africa. Cape Town, C. StruikGoogle Scholar
Scott, J.K. & Adair, R.J. (1990) The commencement of biological control of bitou bush and boneseed (Chrysanthemoides momlifera). pp 126129in Heap, J.W (Ed) Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds Conference,Adelaide,6–10 August 1990. Crop Science Society of South Australia IncGoogle Scholar
Sutherst, R.W. & Maywald, G.F. (1985) A computerised system for matching climates in ecology Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 13, 281299.Google Scholar
Wapshere, A.J. (1974) A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Annals of Applied Biology 77, 201211Google Scholar
Weiss, P. (1986) The biology of Australian weeds 14. Chrysanthemoides momlifera (L) T Norl Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 52, 127134.Google Scholar