Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:36:26.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two new Eulophidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of economic importance from China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

John LaSalle  and
Dawei Huang
John LaSalle*
Affiliation:
International Institute of Entomology, London, UK
Dawei Huang
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
*
Dr John LaSalle, International Institute of Entomology, ℅ Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two new species of Eulophidae, which are potential biological control agents of economically important pests, are described from China. Aprostocetus prolixussp. n. (Tetrastichinae) is an egg-parasitoid of Apriona germarii (Hope) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), and Hyssopus grossorissp. n. (Eulophinae) is a larval parasitoid of Paranthrene tabaniformis (Rottenburg) (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae). The species Elachertus pallidus Askew is transferred to Hyssopus, comb. n.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 51 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Askew, R.R. (1964) On the biology and taxonomy of some European species of the genus Elachertus Spinola (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 55, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertucci, B.M. (1986) Il tarlo vespa del pioppo. Informatore Fitopatologico 36, 29–34.Google Scholar
Booth, R.G., Cox, M.L. & Madge, R.B. (1990) IIE guides to insects of importance to man 3. Coleoptera. 384 pp Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. (1965) A review of the Chalcidoid fauna of the Moldavian S.S.R, with descriptions of new species (Hymenoptera). Acta Faunistica Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 11. 5–37.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. (1988) Australasian Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) 832 pp CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
Bouček, Z. & Askew, R.R. (1968) Index of Palearctic Eulophidae Index of Entomophagous Insects 254 pp. Paris, Le François.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. & Graham, M.W.R. de V. (1978) Chalcidoidea. pp. 67–119in Fitton, M.G., Graham, M.W.R. de V., Bouček, Z.R.J, Fergusson, N.D.M., Huddleston, T, Quinlan, J & Ricards, O.W.A check list of British insects Part 4: Hymenoptera. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects 11, 1–159.Google Scholar
Duffy, E.A.J. (1968) A monograph of the immature stages of Oriental timber beetles (Cerambycidae). 434 pp+18 plates London, British Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Fibiger, M. & Kristensen, N.P. (1974) The Sesiidae (Lepidoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 2, 1–91Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. (1916) Descriptions of eleven new species of chalcid flies. [continued]. Canadian Entomologist 48, 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. (1983) Madeira insects: faunal notes, additions, and descriptions of new species of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Boletim do Museu Municipal do Funchal 35, 5–40.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. (1987) A reclassification of the European Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), with a revision of certain genera. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology series 55, 1–392.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. (1991) A reclassification of the European Tetrasbchinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae): revision of the remaining genera. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 49, 1–322.Google Scholar
Hansson, C. (1991) A catalogue of the Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) described by C.G. Thomson, with a checklist of Swedish species. Entomologica Scandinavica supplement 38, 1–70.Google Scholar
LaSalle, J. (1994) North American genera of Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Journal of Natural History 28, 109–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, D.-X., Li, X.-L., Pang, X.-F. & Chen, T.-L. (1987) Economic insect fauna of China Fascicle 34 Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea (1). 241 pp., 24 plates Beijing, Science Press, (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Miwa, Y. & Sonan, J. (1935) Description of a new egg-parasite of Melanauster chinensis Forst. from Formosa Transactions of the Natural History Society of Formosa 25, 406–407. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
Moraal, L.G. (1987) Apanteles evonymellae fauna n.sp., een nieuwe parasitoid van de populiereglasvlinder, Paranthrene tabamformis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Lepidoptera Sesiidae) Entomologische Berichten, Amsterdam 47, 137–139.Google Scholar
Moraal, L.G. (1989) Telenomus phalaenarum fauna nov.spec., als eiparasitoid van de populiereglasvlinder, Paranthrene tabaniformis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae, Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) Entomologische Berichten, Amsterdam 49, 65–68Google Scholar
Schauff, M.E. (1985) Revision of the Nearctic species of Hyssopus Girault (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 93, 1096–1108.Google Scholar
Szontagh, P. (1971) Adatok a Paranthrene tabaniformis Rott (Lep.) fejlodési és parazitáltsági viszonyaihoz Folia Entomologica Hungarica 24, 99–108 (In Hungarian)Google Scholar
Wang, Y-J. & Zhao, Z.-C. (1988) Study on Aprostocetus sp—egg parasite of Apriona german (Hope) Kunchong Zhishi [Entomological Knowledge] 25, 347–350 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Wang, G.-J., Zhao, R.-Z. & Huang, D.-W. (1991) Three species of Eulophidae parasitizing on some borers of poplar in Jilin Province. Acta Entomologica Sinica 34, 230–233 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
You, L.-S., Xiong, S.-L., Dang, X.-D. & Tong, X.-W. (1987) Four new species of Apanteles Forster from China (Hymenoptera: Braconidae Microgasterinae). Entomotaxonomia 9, 275–281(In Chinese)Google Scholar