Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:07:42.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bruchophagus muli sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), a wasp which galls the fruit of lime in Papua New Guinea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Z. Bouček  and
E. J. Brough
Z. Bouček
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, c/o British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
E. J. Brough
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, P.O. Box 320 University, Papua New Guinea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bruchophagus muli sp. n. is described and compared to a similar Australian species, B. fellis (Girault). Both wasps attack citrus; B. muli galls the fruit of lime (Citrus aurantifolia) while B. fellis galls the twigs of a number of citrus varieties in Australia, including lemon, orange and grapefruit. B. muli appears to be restricted in distribution to the southern region of Papua New Guinea

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 347 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1971). Insect pest survey for the year ending 30th June, 1968.— Papua New Guin. agric. J. 22, 179–201.Google Scholar
Brough, E.J. (1980). Observations on citrus insects in the Port Moresby environs.— pp. 492–495 in Proc. 2nd Papua New Guinea Food Crops Conference.— Konedobu, Papua New Guinea, Department of Primary Industry.Google Scholar
Brough, E.J. (1982). Information wanted: a fruit gall wasp of citrus in Papua New Guinea.— Harvest. 8, 128–130.Google Scholar
Noble, N. S. (1936). The citrus gall wasp (Eurytoma fellis Girault).—Sci. Bull. Dep. Agric. N.S.W. no. 53, 41 pp.Google Scholar