Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:59:05.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anopheles darlingi Root (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Suriname rain forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. E. Hudson
J. E. Hudson
Affiliation:
Ministry of Health, Bureau of Public Health, P.O. Box 767, Paramaribo, Suriname
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Females of Anopheles darlingi Root were the commonest (98·6%) of 5464 anophelines taken in 866 man-hours of human bait catches at night, in or near houses in the rain forest in Suriname during 1979–81, but their abundance could not be related to the prevalence of human malaria. In most endemic areas, few females were taken. At Aseli Kamp (4°17'N, 53°24'W) on the Lawa River, biting females were most abundant from April to June, during the long rainy season and rare or absent from September to March, during the long dry, short rainy and short dry seasons. At Apoma Tapoe, however, only 40 km downstream, they were most abundant in october and November, during the long dry season. Females entered houses to feed, with peak biting activity between 22·00 and 23·00 h, and were observed to rest near the collector for a mean of 7·7 min before and 17·1 min after feeding. No females were found resting by day, in buildings or out of doors. The mean parous rate of 827 females from biting catches was 43·6%. The expected biting rate of females was reduced by 20·3% in a house for six nights after it had been sprayed with DDT wettable powder (2 g/m2 active ingredient), and by a mean of 82·6% during seven nights in a camp where the edge of the surrounding forest was sprayed with an ultra-low-volume mist of 95% fenitrothion (1·3 ml active ingredient per metre of perimeter) on the first, third and sixth days. A. darlingi larvae were found at Aseli Kamp in all seasons along the river's edge between water hyacinth plants (Eichhornia) and floating debris, and during the long rains in flooded forest.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 129 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, S. T. & Jenkins, C. D. (1972). Changing personal and social behaviour: experiences of health workers in a tribal society.—Soc. Sci. & Med. 6. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, M. (1947). The laboratory colonization of Anopheles darlingi. —J. natn. Malar. Soc. 6, 155–158.Google ScholarPubMed
Bonne, C. & Bonne-Wepster, J. (1925). Mosquitoes of Surinam.—Meded. K. Vereen. indisch. Inst. Amst. no. 21. 558 pp. (Afd. Trop. Hyg. no. 13).Google Scholar
Bruyning, C. F. A. (1952). Some observations on the distribution of A. darlingi Root in the savanna region of Surinam.—Documenta Med. geogr. trop. 4. 171–174.Google Scholar
Charlwood, J. D. (1980). Observations on the bionomics of Anopheles darlingi Root (Diptera:Culicidae) from Brazil.—Bull, ent. Res. 70, 685–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlwood, J. D. & Hayes, J. (1978). Variaçōes geográficas no ciclo de picada do Anopheles darlingi Root no Brasil.—Acta Amazonica 8. 601–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlwood, J. D. & Wilkes, T. J. (1979). Studies on the age-composition of samples of Anopheles darlingi Root (Diptera: Culicidae) in Brazil. —Bull, ent. Res. 69. 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, G. (1982). Developments in malaria vector control. —Br. med. Bull. 38, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Bustamante, F. M. (1951). Efeito das aplicaçōes intradomiciliárias de DDT sôbre a densidade do Anopheles darlingi em várias regiōes do Brasil.—Revta bras. Malar. Doenç. trop. 3. 571–590.Google Scholar
De Bustamante, F. M., Pinto, O. S. & De Freitas, J. R. (1952). Observaçōes sôbre o comportarnento do Anopheles darlingi em casas experirnentais tratadas com DDT e BHC na área de Engenheiro Dolabela. Estado de Minas Gerais.—Revta bras. Malar. Doenc. trop. 4. 347–359.Google ScholarPubMed
Deane, L. M., Causey, O. R. & Deane, M. P. (1948). Notas sôbre a distribuiçāo e a biologia dos anofelinos das regiōes Nordestina e Arnazônica do Brasil.—Revta Serv. esp. Saúde puhl., Rio de J. 1, 827–965.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. (1972). The influence of vector behavior on malaria transmission. —Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 21, 755–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faran, M. E. & Linthicum, K. J. (1981). A handbook of the Amazonian species of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) (Diptera: Culicidae).—Mosq. Syst. 13. 1–81.Google Scholar
Floch, H. (1954). Exophilie des anophèles et transmission residuelle du paludisme.—Archs Inst. Pasteur Guyane fr. 15 no. 346, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Gabaldon, A. (1952). The effect of DDT on the population of anopheline vectors in Venezuela.—Riv. Parassit. 13, 29–41.Google Scholar
Giglioli, G. (1951). Eradication of Anopheles darlingi from the inhabited areas of British Guiana by DDT residual spraying.—J. natn. Malar. Soc. 10, 142–161.Google ScholarPubMed
Giglioli, G. (1956). Biological variations in Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles gambiae: their effect on practical malaria control in the neotropical region.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 15, 461–471.Google ScholarPubMed
Haddow, A. J. (1960). Studies on the biting habits and medical importance of East African mosquitos in the genus Aedes. I.—Subgenera Aedimorphus, Banksinella and Dunnius.—Bull. ent. Res. 50. 759–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajot, F. X., Le Pont, F., Molez, J. F. & Degallier, N. (1977). Agressivité d'Anopheles (Nys sorhynchus) darlingi Root. 1926 (Diptera. Culicidae) en Guyane française.—Cah. ORSTOM, Sér. Entomol. med. Parasitol. 15, 15–22.Google Scholar
Panday, R. S. (1977). Anopheles nuneztovari and malaria transmission in Surinam.—Mosquito News 37. 728–737.Google Scholar
Panday, R. S. (1979). Medical entomological aspects of the malaria problem in Surinam.—Surinaams Medisch Bull. 3, 52–58.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & Webley, D. J. (1969). A verandah-trap hut for studying the house-frequenting habits of mosquitoes and for assessing insecticides. III. The effect of DDT on behaviour and mortality.—Bull. ent. Res. 59. 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symes, C. B. & Hadaway, A. B. (1947). Initial experiments in the use of DDT against mosquitos in British Guiana.—Bull, ent. Res. 37, 399–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Thiel, P. H. (1962). Malaria problems arising from the construction of a reservoir in the interior of Surinam.—Trop. geogr. Med. 14. 259–278.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Der Kaay, H. J. (1976). Malaria in Surinam, a sero-epidemiological study. —Acta leidensia 43. 1–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Der Kuyp, E. (1950). Contribution to the study of the malarial epidemiology in Surinam.—Meded. K. Vereen. indisch Inst. Amst. no. 89. 146 pp. (Afd. Trop. Hyg. no. 18).Google Scholar
Van Der Kupe, E. (1954). Malaria in Nickerie (Surinarn).—Documenra Med. geogr. trop. 7. 259–262.Google Scholar
Who (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION) (1975). Manual of practical entomology in malaria. Part I. Vector bionomics and organization of anti-malaria activities.—160 pp. Geneva, Wld Hlth Org. (WHO Offset Publication no. 13).Google Scholar