Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:15:54.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade off between thermal comfort and pollutant (ammonia) exposure in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J. B. Jones ,
C. M. Wathes  and
A. J. F. Webster
J. B. Jones
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
C. M. Wathes
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS
A. J. F. Webster
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
Get access

Extract

The thermal insulation of pigs (Sus scrofa) is considered poor (Mount and Ingram, 1965) as they do not have a thick coat and have a variable subcutaneous fat thickness. Ventilation rates in animal houses are often reduced in colder weather to maintain an optimal thermal environment. However this may fail to remove atmospheric pollutants (e.g. Menses, 1987).

Type
Poster abstracts
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 20: Animal Choices , 1997 , pp. 106 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Curtis, S. E. 1972. Air environment and animal performance. Journal of Animal Science 35: 628–634.Google Scholar
Doig, P. A. and Willoughby, R. A. 1971. Response of swine to atmospheric ammonia and organic dust. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 159: 1353–1361.Google Scholar
Gustin, P., Urbain, B., Prouvost, J. F. and Ansay, M. 1994. Effects of atmospheric ammonia on pulmonary hemodynamics and vascular permeability in pigs: interaction with endotoxins. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 125: 17–26.Google Scholar
Jones, J. B., Burgess, L. R., Webster, A. J. F. and Watties, C. M. 1996. Behavioural responses of pigs to atmospheric ammonia in a chronic choice test. Animal Science 63: 437–445.Google Scholar
Menses, J. F. 1987. Gases in pig and poultry houses — prevention and control techniques. In Agriculture — environmental aspects of respiratory disease in intensive pig and poultry houses, including implications for human health (ed. Bruce, J. M. and Sommer, M.), pp. 95–100. Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Mount, L. E. and Ingram, D. L. 1965. Effects of ambient temperature and air movement on localized sensible heat loss from the pig. Research in Veterinary Science 6: 84–91.Google Scholar