No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2019
In a review of recent Newton scholarship, H. Floris Cohen charges that my paper is not a ‘case of worthwhile innovation, or even of any innovation at all’. I beg to differ.
1 In his ‘Stock and bulk in the latest Newton scholarship’, BJHS (2018) 51, pp. 687–701, 692CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Subsequent page references are given parenthetically in the text. At issue was my paper ‘Newton's concepts of force among the Leibnizians’, in Boran, E.A and Feingold, M., Reading Newton in Early Modern Europe (Leiden: Brill, 2017), pp. 244–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Basnage de Beauval, H., ‘Lettre de M. Bernoulli à l'Autheur’ (1697), Histoire des ouvrages des savans (1721) 13, pp. 452–467, 455Google Scholar.
3 For details see Stan, Marius, ‘Kant's third law of mechanics: the long shadow of Leibniz’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (2013) 44, pp. 493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar.