Article contents
The Iron-Age Hill-fort and Romano-British Iron-working Settlement at Garden Hill, Sussex: Interim Report on Excavations, 1968–76
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2011
Extract
The earthwork at Garden Hill, Hartjield, East Sussex, until then unrecognised, was identified in 1968 by Mr C. F. Tebbutt, who found early Romano-British material in a trial excavation. Five seasons of excavation (1972–76) by the Garden Hill Excavation Group have established the broad outline of the site's history. A scatter of worked flints indicates slight occupation in the Neolithic/Bronze Age period. Attributed to the late pre-Roman Iron Age are a round house and part of what may be another. A hill-fort, with stonerevetted and palisaded defences, was built, possibly against the Roman invasion, but soon fell into disuse and was followed by Romano-British occupation. This included a rectangular timber building, roasting- and smeltingfurnaces and a forging-hearth of the first century; a rectangular building with two verandahs, using timber uprights set on padstones and in post-holes, and a four-post structure on the same alignment, both probably first-century; a timber building set on a stone platform and attached stone bath-building, of the second century; and undated post-hole and timber-slot systems (not fully excavated) representing fences and other timber structures. It is possible that Garden Hill was the base from which local iron-smelting sites were operated in the first and second centuries.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © J. H. Money 1977. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies
References
1 In the Parliamentary Surveys of Sussex (1658) the hill is called ‘Gardine Hill’, see Sussex Arch. Colls, xxiii (1871), 251Google Scholar; the late 18th-century Hartfield parish rate-books call it ‘Garden Hill’.
2 Margary, I. D., Sussex Notes and Queries, xvi, 330Google Scholar, and Roman Roads in Britain (London 1973). 37 and 59–62Google Scholar.
3 Tebbutt, C. F., Sussex Arch. Colls, cviii (1970), 39–49Google Scholar.
4 Money, J. H., Current Archaeology No. 41 (1973), 185–88Google Scholar; see also Britannia iv (1973), 321Google Scholar, 333; v (1974). 458; vi (1975, 282; and vii (1976), 373-4.
5 Tebbutt, C. F. and Cleere, H. F., Sussex Arch. Colls, cxi (1973). 27–40Google Scholar; Cleere, H. F., Arch. Journ. cxxxi (1974), 185 and 198Google Scholar.
7 Note by Money, J. H. in Antiq. Journ. liv (1974), 278–80Google Scholar.
8 Note by Harden, D. B. in Antiq. Journ. liv (1974), 280–81Google Scholar.
9 Mrs J. Bird kindly assisted with the identification of the samian.
10 B. Philp, Excavations in West Kent 1960–1970 (1973), fig. 43, 359.
11 Tester, P. J., Arch. Cant, lxviii (1954), fig. 3. 6–7Google Scholar.
12 Birchenough, E., Greenfield, E., Meates, G. W., Arch. Cant, lxiii (1950), fig. 5, 7–8Google Scholar.
13 Ward-Perkins, J. B., Archaeologia xc (1944), 127–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Fulford, M. G. in Cunliffe, B. W., Excavations in Portchester Castle i (1975), 270–367Google Scholar.
- 6
- Cited by