Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-29T23:23:35.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distinguishing between the Pes Monetalis and the Pres Drusianus: some problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Martin Millett
Martin Millett
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Britannia , Volume 13 , November 1982 , pp. 315 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Martin Millett 1982. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

74 Frere, S. S., ‘Town Planning in the Western Provinces’, Bericht der Romisch-Germanischen Kommission lviii (1977), 87–103Google Scholar; Walthew, C. V., ‘Property Boundaries and the Sizes of Building Plots in Roman Towns’, Britannia ix (1978), 335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Duncan-Jones, R. P., ‘Length-Units in Roman Town Planning’, Britannia xi (1980), 127–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walthew, C. V., ‘Possible Standard Units of Measurement in Roman Military Planning’, Britannia xii (1981), 15–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The information in this paper was gathered at the invitation of Professor S. S. Frere who kindly made his drawings available to me. I am extremely grateful to Martin Jones and Simon James for reading the text in draft. All errors remain my own.

75 Duncan-Jones, op. cit. (note 74), 127-8.

76 loc. cit. (note 75).

77 Frere, op. cit. (note 74), 93.

78 Walthew 1981, op. cit. (note 74), 16.

79 Duncan-Jones, op. cit. (note 74), 130-1.

80 Using this method the margin of error accepted can be altered and the effect calculated by examination of TABLES 1 and 2.