Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:38:59.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Re-Audit of the Assessment and Management of Patients With Alcohol Use Disorders Following Admission to the General Adult Inpatient Wards in Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Declan Hyland*
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Ranjan Baruah
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Mohammed Hussain
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Hollie Buchan
Affiliation:
Aberdeen Medical School, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

This re-audit aimed to determine the level of performance in the assessment and management of patients with alcohol use disorders following admission to one of the general adult inpatient wards in Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust and to determine whether the level of performance has improved compared to the original audit done in 2021 and whether recommendations that were implemented following the original audit have been effective.

Methods

A list of all inpatients on each of the eight general adult inpatient wards in the Trust was obtained. The electronic patient record (on RiO) and electronic prescription card (on EPMA) for each inpatient was scrutinised to obtain the required data. All data were collected retrospectively.

Results

A total of 149 inpatients were identified on the eight general adult inpatient wards. Using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, 56 of the 149 inpatients formed the final sample. Of the 56 inpatients, 58% were male, 42% were female. An alcohol history was documented in 81% of the 56 inpatients, representing an improvement on the 45% in the original audit in 2021. An average weekly quantity of alcohol for the inpatient was documented in only 8% of cases, a drop from 22% in the original audit in 2021. There was minor improvement in documentation of a CIWA-R score for the inpatient on admission to the ward - an increase from 0.7% in 2021 to 4.0% in 2022. There were improvements on gamma GT and serum Magnesium level being checked on admission for the 2022 audit cohort compared with the 2021 audit cohort. There was also an improvement on referral of the inpatient to community alcohol services - 3% in the 2021 audit vs 7% in the 2022 audit.

Conclusion

The findings from this re-audit indicate an improved level of performance in assessment and management of patients with alcohol use disorders following admission to the general adult inpatient ward since the original audit in 2021. Recommendations from this re-audit are: ensuring that taking and documenting a thorough alcohol history is included in the induction for junior trainees, the provision of education and training to both medical and nursing staff on the wards in using the CIWA-R to assess level of alcohol withdrawal and producing a flow chart on the assessment and management of alcohol use in patients following admission to the ward that can be displayed in the Treatment Room on each ward and in the Junior Doctors’ office.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.