Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:31:03.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving Care for Service Users With Learning Disability by Increasing Early MDT Coordination for Those Referred With Behaviours That Challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Benjamin Knox*
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Anthony Jones
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Shaista Mufti
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Chloe Gimbuta
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Nicole Eady
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Ellen Boddington
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Katie Ash
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Our aim was for 80% of new referrals for behaviours that challenge within Tower Hamlets Community Learning Disability service to have an MDT coordinated approach by July 2022. This followed concerns about disjointed care and long waits for therapeutic support when being referred between different MDT branches within the service having a negative impact on patient care.

Methods

An MDT project team was formed and weekly meetings were arranged. A driver diagram was created. Our primary outcome measure was determined: percentage of referred patients per week that had MDT coordinated assessments, with data being collected manually from electronic progress notes and MDT meeting minutes. Number of referrals per week was recorded as a process measure. Baseline data were added to the Life QI web platform upon collection, allowing generation of run charts for outcome and process measures. The time-frame over which referrals were recorded was changed from weekly to fortnightly, to help differentiate graphically between zero values resulting from the absence of MDT coordination and those resulting from no referrals being received on a given week. Attempts were made to obtain service user input via easy-read questionnaires and subsequent discussion in a service user participation group. A weekly Positive Behavioural Support meeting was set up and a Positive Behavioural Support database was established, and the combination of these changes simplified data collection and gave a focus to MDT working and collaboration for these service users. Data were recorded from 28/06/2021 to 03/07/2022 initially and subsequently extended to 06/11/2022 as part of a further PDSA cycle.

Results

A shift in proportion of service users referred with behaviour that challenges who had MDT involvement at the point of allocation was observed, to above the mean value of 0.5, commencing 07/02/2022, this shift was sustained until the project's endpoint. In terms of our process measure, the median number of new behaviour that challenges referrals per fortnightly period to psychiatry and psychology was one. This ranged from 0-4 referrals per fortnightly period, but no sustained change in this value was observed over the course of the project.

Conclusion

Implementing a new behaviour that challenges database and weekly meeting to focus on MDT coordinated working in those newly referred with behaviour that challenges has been successful in leading to a measurable and sustained improvement in the proportion of those service users receiving timely MDT coordinated care.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.