Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T09:25:03.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiences of people seen in an acute hospital setting by liaison mental health services: responses from an online survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Daniel Romeu*
Affiliation:
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Elspeth Guthrie
Affiliation:
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds
Carolyn Czoski-Murray
Affiliation:
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds
Samuel Relton
Affiliation:
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds
Andrew Walker
Affiliation:
Clinical Research Network National Coordinating Centre, National Institute of Heath Research
Peter Trigwell
Affiliation:
National Inpatient Centre for Psychological Medicine, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Jenny Hewison
Affiliation:
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds
Robert West
Affiliation:
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds
Mike Crawford
Affiliation:
Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, College Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists
Matt Fossey
Affiliation:
Veterans and Families Institute for Military Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University
Claire Hulme
Affiliation:
College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter
Allan House
Affiliation:
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Recently the NHS has expanded the provision of liaison mental health services (LMHS) to ensure that every acute hospital with an emergency department in England has a liaison psychiatry service. Little work has been undertaken to explore first-hand experiences of these services. The aim of this study was to capture service users’ experiences of LMHS in both emergency departments and acute inpatient wards in the UK, with a view to adapt services to better meet the needs of its users.

Method

This cross-sectional internet survey was initially advertised from May-July 2017 using the social media platform Facebook. Due to a paucity of male respondents, it was re-run from November 2017-February 2018, specifically targeting this demographic group. 184 people responded to the survey, of which 147 were service users and 37 were service users’ accompanying partners, friends or family members. The survey featured a structured questionnaire divided into three categories: the profile of the respondent, perceived professionalism of LMHS, and overall opinion of the service. Space was available for free-text comments in each section. Descriptive analysis of quantitative data was undertaken with R statistical software V.3.2.2. Qualitative data from free-text comments were transcribed and interpreted independently by three researchers using framework analysis; familiarisation with the data was followed by identification of a thematic framework, indexing, charting, mapping and interpretation.

Result

Opinions of the service were mixed but predominantly negative. 31% of service users and 27% of their loved ones found their overall contact with LMHS useful. Features most frequently identified as important were the provision of a 24/7 service, assessment by a variety of healthcare professionals and national standardisation of services. Respondents indicated that the least important feature was the provision of a separate service for older people. They also expressed that a desirable LMHS would include faster assessments following referral from the parent team, clearer communication about next steps and greater knowledge of local services and third sector organisations.

Conclusion

Our survey identified mixed responses, however service users and their loved ones perceived LMHS more frequently as negative than positive. This may be attributed to the recent governmental drive to assess, treat and discharge 95% of all patients seen in emergency departments within four hours of initial attendance. Additionally, dissatisfied service users are more likely to volunteer their opinions. The evaluation and adaptation of LMHS should be prioritised to enhance their inherent therapeutic value and improve engagement with treatment and future psychiatric care.

Type
Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.