Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:47:19.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Case Study of Cognitive Impairment Associated With Levetiracetam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Stefan McKenzie*
Affiliation:
South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, United Kingdom
Kalyan Seelam
Affiliation:
South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

In patients with cognitive impairment, it is important to assess the possible impact of medications on cognition. Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic medication used in the management of epilepsy. Its effect on cognition is unclear.

Methods

We present a case study of a 57-year-old female who developed cognitive impairment associated with levetiracetam.

She was referred to Memory Services from her GP due to cognitive impairment. Her past medical history included an optic nerve glioma which was surgically removed followed by radiotherapy, and meningiomas which were managed with stereotactic radiosurgery. She had no previous psychiatric history.

Following a first seizure, she was started on levetiracetam 250 mg BD. Over the following months, she developed worsening symptoms of poor memory, fatigue and lethargy, sleeping excessively, headaches, and subsequently, low mood and occasional suicidal thoughts. Levetiracetam dose was halved. When seen in Memory Services 3 months later, it was reported that there had been a gradual but partial improvement in her symptoms since the dose reduction. Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) score was 67/100. Short form mood scale was 3/15, below the threshold for depression. Blood tests were normal. MRI Head showed meningiomas and diffuse white matter hyperintensities, both unchanged from previous imaging.

The patient then started lamotrigine and stopped levetiracetam. On follow up (2 months after initial memory assessment), ACE-III score improved to 80/100 and it was reported that her symptoms had completely resolved.

Results

In this case, there is evidence to support a causal link between levetiracetam and the patient's cognitive impairment – there was a temporal relationship, dose response relationship, and reversibility, which are all in the Bradford Hill criteria for causation. Other causes were considered and deemed less likely, including depression; the mood symptoms were not the predominant symptoms and developed after the other symptoms, and the patient scored below the threshold score for depression on short form mood scale.

Regarding the aetiology in this case, one hypothesis is that there may have been risk factors that made this patient more susceptible to cognitive side effects from the biological effects of levetiracetam, such as previous neurosurgery and radiosurgery. Another hypothesis is that the levetiracetam may have triggered an atypical depressive episode which manifested predominantly with memory symptoms and tiredness.

Conclusion

This case study highlights the importance of reviewing medications when assessing cognitive impairment, and of obtaining a clear timeline of symptoms. There is a need for further research looking at the effect of levetiracetam on cognition.

Type
6 Case Study
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.