Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:31:37.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separating vs. shrinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2019

Michael T. Putnam Open the ORCID record for Michael T. Putnam [Opens in a new window]
Michael T. Putnam*
Affiliation:
Penn State University
*
Address for correspondence: Michael T. Putnam, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 41 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benmamoun, E, Montrul, S and Polinsky, M (2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 129–181.10.1515/tl-2013-0009Google Scholar
Bousquette, J, Putnam, M, Salmons, J, Frey, B and Nützel, D (2016) Multiple grammars, dominance, and optimization. In Optimality-theoretic syntax, semantics, and pragmatics: From uni- to bidirectional optimization, Legendre, G, Putnam, M, de Swart, H, and Zaroukian, E (eds) Oxford: Oxford University Press, (pp. 158–176).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757115.003.0007Google Scholar
Christiansen, M and Chater, N (2016) Creating language. Integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10406.001.0001Google Scholar
Hopp, H, Putnam, M and Vosburg, N (2019) Derivational complexity vs. transfer effects: Long-distance wh-movement in heritage and L2 grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(3), 341–375.10.1075/lab.17014.hopGoogle Scholar
Hsin, L and Legendre, G (2019) Strong Integration in bilingual grammar, formalized: Making the case from cross-linguistic influence in wh-questions. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(3), 427–467.10.1075/lab.17040.hsiGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M (2018) Heritage languages and their speakers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107252349Google Scholar
Polinsky, M and Scontras, G (2019) Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000245Google Scholar
Putnam, M, Carlson, M and Reitter, D (2018) Integrated, not isolated: Defining typological proximity in an integrated multilingual architecture. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2212.10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02212Google Scholar
Riksem, BR (2017) Language mixing and diachronic change: American Norwegian Noun Phrases then and now. Languages, 2, 3, doi: 10.3390/languages2020003Google Scholar
Schwarz, L (2019) Morphological (in)stability in heritage Germanic: Examining the role of form and function. PhD dissertation, Penn State University.Google Scholar