Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:31:52.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interference suppression in bilingualism: Stimulus-Stimulus vs. Stimulus-Response conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2021

Lihua Xia ,
Thomas H. Bak ,
Antonella Sorace  and
Mariana Vega-Mendoza
Lihua Xia*
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh
Thomas H. Bak
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh
Antonella Sorace
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh
Mariana Vega-Mendoza
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Department of Health, Education and Technology. Engineering Psychology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
*
Address for correspondence: Lihua Xia, School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong University of Science and Technology: 1037 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430074. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies examining the potential effects of bilingualism on interference suppression show inconsistent results. Our study approaches this topic by distinguishing two potential subcomponents within interference suppression (i.e., Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response conflict). We investigated the two subcomponents through their operationalisation in different tasks and examined the role of language proficiency in modulating it. A sample of 111 young adult participants performed four non-linguistic cognitive tasks measuring both visual and auditory domains of cognitive control. Bilinguals outperformed monolinguals in tasks involving Stimulus-Stimulus conflict, but showed comparable performance in tasks involving Stimulus-Response conflict. Specific effects of language proficiency on cognitive control were observed: group differences in auditory inhibition and visual orienting were only observed between high-proficient bilinguals and monolinguals. Taken together, types of conflicts involved in interference tasks and language proficiency could differentially affect performance in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Keywords

bilingualisminterference suppressionStimulus-Stimulus inhibitionStimulus-Response inhibitionlanguage proficiency
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 256 - 268
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albantakis, L, Branzi, FM, Costa, A and Deco, G (2012) A multiple-choice task with changes of mind. PLoS ONE 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baayen, RH, Davidson, DJ and Bates, DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bak, TH (2016) Cooking pasta in La Paz: Bilingualism, bias and the replication crisis. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6(5), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16002.bakCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bak, TH, Long, MR, Vega-Mendoza, M and Sorace, A (2016) Novelty, Challenge, and Practice: The Impact of Intensive Language Learning on Attentional Functions. PLOS ONE 11(4), e0153485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153485CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bak, TH, Vega-Mendoza, M and Sorace, A (2014) Never too late? An advantage on tests of auditory attention extends to late bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00485CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E (2006) Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale 60(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/cjep2006008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E (2017) The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin 143(3), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000099CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E (2020) Null results in bilingualism research: What they tell us and what they don't. Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices 1(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.17104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E and DePape, A.-M. (2009) Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35(2), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012735Google ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E and Viswanathan, M (2009) Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures. Cognition 112(3), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E, Craik, FIM and Luk, G (2012) Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(4), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E, Craik, FIM, Klein, R and Viswanathan, M (2004) Bilingualism, Aging, and Cognitive Control: Evidence From the Simon Task. Psychology and Aging 19(2), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E, Craik, F and Luk, G (2008) Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34(4), 859–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859Google ScholarPubMed
Blumenfeld, HK and Marian, V (2013) Parallel language activation and cognitive control during spoken word recognition in bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25(5), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.812093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumenfeld, HK and Marian, V (2014) Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in Stimulus-Stimulus inhibition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(3), 610–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000564CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunge, SA, Dudukovic, NM, Thomason, ME, Vaidya, CJ and Gabrieli, JDE (2002) Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children. Neuron 33(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00583-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, P, Bobb, SC, Hoshino, N and Marian, V (2017) Neural signatures of language co-activation and control in bilingual spoken word comprehension. Brain Research 1665, 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.03.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, SH, Zhou, Q, Uchikoshi, Y and Bunge, SA (2014) Variations on the bilingual advantage? Links of Chinese and English proficiency to Chinese American children's self-regulation. Frontiers in Psychology 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01069CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung-Fat-Yim, A, Sorge, GB and Bialystok, E (2017) The relationship between bilingualism and selective attention in young adults: Evidence from an ambiguous figures task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 70(3), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1221435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A, Hernández, M and Sebastián-Gallés, N (2008) Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition 106(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A, Hernández, M, Costa-Faidella, J and Sebastián-Gallés, N (2009) On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don't. Cognition 113(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, SR, Bak, TH, Allerhand, M, Redmond, P, Starr, JM, Deary, IJ and MacPherson, SE (2016) Bilingualism, social cognition and executive functions: A tale of chickens and eggs. Neuropsychologia 91, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.029CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunnings, I (2012) An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers. Second Language Research 28(3), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312443651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T and van Heuven, WJB (2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5(3), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728902003012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y and Xie, Z (2014) Contributions of second language proficiency and interpreting experience to cognitive control differences among young adult bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26(5), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.924951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, AG, Baker-Ward, L and Mueller, ST (2013) Interference suppression vs. response inhibition: An explanation for the absence of a bilingual advantage in preschoolers’ Stroop task performance. Cognitive Development 28(4), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.09.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, J, McCandliss, BD, Sommer, T, Raz, A and Posner, MI (2002) Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional Networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14(3), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garraffa, M, Obregon, M, O'Rourke, B and Sorace, A (2020) Language and Cognition in Gaelic-English Young Adult Bilingual Speakers: A Positive Effect of School Immersion Program on Attentional and Grammatical Skills. Frontiers in Psychology 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, DW (1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and cognition 1(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, DW and Abutalebi, J (2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25(5), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grundy, J. G. (2020). The effects of bilingualism on executive functions: an updated quantitative analysis. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-020-00062-5Google Scholar
Grundy, JG, Pavlenko, E and Bialystok, E (2020) Bilingualism modifies disengagement of attention networks across the scalp: A multivariate ERP investigation of the IOR paradigm. Journal of Neurolinguistics 56, 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, M, Costa, A, Fuentes, LJ, Vivas, AB and Sebastián-Gallés, N (2010) The impact of bilingualism on the executive control and orienting networks of attention. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilchey, MD and Klein, RM (2011) Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18(4), 625–658. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0116-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hübner, R and Töbel, L (2019) Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task. PloS one 14(3), e0214203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, NY, Yuan, M, Fong, MCM and Wang, WSy (2020) L2 proficiency predicts inhibitory ability in L1-dominant speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920914399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iluz-Cohen, P and Armon-Lotem, S (2013) Language proficiency and executive control in bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(4), 884–899. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janus, M, Lee, Y, Moreno, S and Bialystok, E (2016) Effects of short-term music and second-language training on executive control. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 144, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiao, L, Liu, C, Wang, R and Chen, B (2019) Working memory demand of a task modulates bilingual advantage in executive functions. International Journal of Bilingualism 23(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917709097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keehner, M and Gathercole, SE (2007) Cognitive adaptations arising from nonnative experience of sign language in hearing adults. Memory & Cognition 35(4), 752–761. https://doi-org.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/10.3758/BF03193312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khare, V, Verma, A, Kar, B, Srinivasan, N and Brysbaert, M (2013) Bilingualism and the increased attentional blink effect: Evidence that the difference between bilinguals and monolinguals generalizes to different levels of second language proficiency. Psychological Research 77(6), 728–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0466-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kousaie, S and Phillips, NA (2012) Conflict monitoring and resolution: Are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials. Brain Research 1446, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramsch, C and Thorne, S (2002) Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In Block, D & Cameron, D (eds), Globalization and language teaching. London: Routledge (pp. 83–100).Google Scholar
Kroll, JF and Bialystok, E (2013) Understanding the Consequences of Bilingualism for Language Processing and Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology (Hove, England) 25(5), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.799170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, J, Dussias, P, Bice, K and Perrotti, L (2015) Bilingualism, Mind, and Brain. Annu. Rev. Linguist., 1(1), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124937CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehtonen, M, Soveri, A, Laine, A, Järvenpää, J, de Bruin, A and Antfolk, J (2018) Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 144(4), 394–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, X, Banich, MT, Jacobson, BL and Tanabe, JL (2004) Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. NeuroImage 22(3), 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. R., Vega-Mendoza, M., Rohde, H., Sorace, A., & Bak, T. H. (2020). Understudied factors contributing to variability in cognitive performance related to language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(4), 801-811. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luk, G and Bialystok, E (2013) Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25(5), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luk, G, Anderson, JAE, Craik, FIM, Grady, C and Bialystok, E (2010) Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain and Cognition 74(3), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.09.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, L, Luk, G and Bialystok, E (2010) Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals. Cognition 114(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marian, V, Blumenfeld, HK and Kaushanskaya, M (2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin-Rhee, MM and Bialystok, E (2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzecová, A, Asanowicz, D, Krivá, L and Wodniecka, Z (2013) The effects of bilingualism on efficiency and lateralization of attentional networks. Bilingualism: Language and cognition 16(3), 608–623. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, RK (2015) Let's not forget about language proficiency and cultural variations while linking bilingualism to executive control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(1), 39–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, RK, Hilchey, MD, Singh, N and Klein, RM (2012) On the time course of exogenous cueing effects in bilinguals: Higher proficiency in a second language is associated with more rapid endogenous disengagement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65(8), 1502–1510. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.657656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A and Friedman, NP (2012) The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, S, Bialystok, E, Barac, R, Schellenberg, EG, Cepeda, NJ and Chau, T (2011) Short-Term Music Training Enhances Verbal Intelligence and Executive Function. Psychological Science 22(11), 1425–1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416999CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ooi, SH, Goh, WD, Sorace, A and Bak, TH (2018) From Bilingualism to Bilingualisms: Bilingual experience in Edinburgh and Singapore affects attentional control differently. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(4), 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paap, KR and Greenberg, ZI (2013) There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology 66(2), 232–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, KR, Johnson, HA and Sawi, O (2014) Are bilingual advantages dependent upon specific tasks or specific bilingual experiences? Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26(6), 615–639. https://doi.org10.1080/20445911.2014.944914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2015). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 69, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, K. R., Anders-Jefferson, R., Mikulinsky, R., Masuda, S., & Mason, L. (2019). On the encapsulation of bilingual language control. Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paap, KR, Anders-Jefferson, R, Zimiga, B, Mason, L and Mikulinsky, R (2020) Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-0207-yGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratte, MS, Rouder, JN, Morey, RD and Feng, C (2010) Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 72(7), 2013–2025. https://doi.org/10.3758/APPCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Raven, JC and Foulds, GA (1962) Advanced Progressive Matrices. London: H.K. Lewis & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Robertson, IH, Ward, T, Ridgeway, V and Nimmo-Smith, I (1994) The test of everyday attention (TEA). Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company, 197-221.Google Scholar
Rosselli, M, Ardila, A, Lalwani, LN and Vélez-Uribe, I (2016) The effect of language proficiency on executive functions in balanced and unbalanced Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(3), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, S, Roehr-Brackin, K, Pak, H and Kim, H (2018) Cultural Effects Rather Than a Bilingual Advantage in Cognition: A Review and an Empirical Study. Cognitive Science 42(7), 2313–2341. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipstead, Z, Redick, TS and Engle, RW (2012) Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin 138(4), 628–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027473CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, JR and Rudell, AP (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 51(3), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, N and Mishra, RK (2015) The modulatory role of second language proficiency on performance monitoring: Evidence from a saccadic countermanding task in high and low proficient bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01481CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slevc, LR, Davey, NS, Buschkuehl, M and Jaeggi, SM (2016) Tuning the mind: Exploring the connections between musical ability and executive functions. Cognition 152, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorge, GB, Toplak, ME and Bialystok, E (2017) Interactions between levels of attention ability and levels of bilingualism in children's executive functioning. Developmental Science 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroop, JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thierry, G and Wu, YJ (2007) Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(30), 12530–12535. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609927104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiego, J, Testa, R, Bellgrove, MA, Pantelis, C and Whittle, S (2018) A hierarchical model of inhibitory control. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 1399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tse, C.-S. and Altarriba, J (2014) The relationship between language proficiency and attentional control in Cantonese-English bilingual children: Evidence from Simon, Simon switching, and working memory tasks. Frontiers in Psychology 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega-Mendoza, M, West, H, Sorace, A and Bak, TH (2015) The impact of late, non-balanced bilingualism on cognitive performance. Cognition 137, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verreyt, N, Woumans, E, Vandelanotte, D, Szmalec, A and Duyck, W (2016) The influence of language-switching experience on the bilingual executive control advantage. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(1), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bastian, C. C., Souza, A. S., & Gade, M. (2016). No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D (1997) Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) (Vol. 14). San Antonio: TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Xie, Z and Pisano, TS (2018) Second language (L2) proficiency, socioeconomic status (SES), and intelligence (IQ) are significant predictors of cognitive control differences among young adult unbalanced Chinese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22(04), 866–882. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yow, WQ and Li, X (2015) Balanced bilingualism and early age of second language acquisition as the underlying mechanisms of a bilingual executive control advantage: why variations in bilingual experiences matter. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Xia et al. supplementary material

Xia et al. supplementary material

Download Xia et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 314.4 KB