Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:17:38.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Happiness, public policy and the notion of development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2019

MARIANO ROJAS
MARIANO ROJAS*
Affiliation:
Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, La Rioja, Spain Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
*
*Correspondence to: Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Av. de la Paz, 137, 26006Logroño, La Rioja, Spain. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Happiness Movement is moving from research to action; this contribution discusses some public policy issues that emerge in this process. The paper also states that the Happiness Movement proposes a new notion of development and a new narrative of social progress. The contribution argues that wellbeing is a goal of governments, but also, fundamentally, a goal of societies.

Type
Articles
Information
Behavioural Public Policy , Volume 4 , Special Issue 2: On Happiness Being the Goal of Government , July 2020 , pp. 166 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © The Author (2019). Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rojas, M. (2006), ‘Life Satisfaction and Satisfaction in Domains of Life: Is It a Simple Relationship?’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4): 467–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (2007), ‘Heterogeneity in the Relationship between Income and Happiness: A Conceptual Referent Theory Explanation’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (2008), ‘Experienced Poverty and Income Poverty in Mexico: A Subjective Well-Being Approach’, World Development, 36(6): 1078–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (2009), ‘Enhancing Poverty-Abatement Programs: A Subjective Well-Being Contribution’, Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(2): 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (2015), ‘Poverty and People's Well-being’, in Glatzer, W., Moller, V., Camfield, L. and Rojas, M. (eds.), Global Handbook of Quality of Life, Springer, 317–350.10.1007/978-94-017-9178-6_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (2016), ‘The Relevance of Happiness: Choosing between Development Paths in Latin America’, in Rojas, M. (ed.), Handbook of Happiness Research in Latin America, Springer, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (2017), ‘The Subjective Object of Well-Being Studies’, in Brulé, G. and Maggino, F. (eds.), Metrics of Subjective Well-Being: Limits and Improvements, Springer, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (2018), Happiness in Latin America has Social Foundations, in J. Helliwell, R. Layard and J. Sachs (eds.) World Happiness Report 2018, New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
Rojas, M. (2019a), ‘The Relevance of Richard Easterlin's Groundbreaking Work. A Historical Perspective’, in Rojas, M. (ed.), The Economics of Happiness: How the Easterlin Paradox Transformed our Understanding of Wellbeing and Progress, Springer, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (ed.) (2019b), The Economics of Happiness: How the Easterlin Paradox Transformed our Understanding of Wellbeing and Progress, Springer, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, M. (2019c), Well-Being in Latin America: Drivers and Policies, Springer, forthcoming.Google Scholar