Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:31:02.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

With reinforcement in trouble, what about motivation?–Bindra's alternative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Ernest R. Hilgard
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif 94305

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abelson, R. Computer simulation of‘hot’ cognition. In: S., Tomkins and Messick, S. (eds.), Computer Simulation of Personality. New York; Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
Bindra, D.Motivation, a Systematic Reinterpretation. New York, Ronald Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Janis, I. L., and Mann, L.Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York, Free Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. Conditioned inhibition of fear. In: Mackintosh, N. J., Honig, W. K. (eds.), Fundamental Issues in Associative Learning. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Dalhousie University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Verplanck, W. S. and Skinner, B. F. In: Estes, W. K. et al. , Modern Learning Theory. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1954.Google Scholar