Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:19:21.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What constitutes “proof” in the study of neural control of movement?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Anthony M. Iannone
Anthony M. Iannone
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 1978 , pp. 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chez, G., Vicario, D. (1977) Isometric tracking in the cat. Poster Presentation, Society for Neuroscience, Abstract No. 862, p. 271.Google Scholar
Evarts, E. V., and Fromm, C. (1977) Motor cortex units discharging most intensively with small precisely controlled arm movements are most sensitive to sensory inputs arising from the arm. Poster Presentation, Society for Neuroscience, Abstract No. 859, p. 271.Google Scholar
Libet, B. (1965) Cortical Activation in Conscious and Unconscious Experience. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 9:77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polit, A. … Bizzi, E.Properties of the motor programs underlying visually triggered arm movements in monkeys. Society for Neuroscience, Abstract No. 882, p. 276.Google Scholar