No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Two kinds of representational functionalism: Defusing the combinatorial explosion
Review products
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2010
Abstract
Alvin Goldman (1993) presents three arguments against the psychological plausibility of representational functionalism (RF) as a theory of how subjects self-ascribe mental predicates. Goldman appears to construe RF as an account of attitude type self-ascription. His “combinatorial explosion” argument, however, proves devastating only to an implausible construal of RF as an account of attitude content self-ascription.
- Type
- Continuing Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995