Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:41:26.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategic pluralism: Men and women start from a different point

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

John Archer  and
Mani Mehdikhani
John Archer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, United Kingdom{j.archer; m.mehdikhani}@uclan.ac.ukwww.uclan.ac.uk/facs/science/psychol/ja.htm
Mani Mehdikhani
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, United Kingdom{j.archer; m.mehdikhani}@uclan.ac.ukwww.uclan.ac.uk/facs/science/psychol/ja.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gangestad & Simpson's (G&S's) analysis of strategic pluralism is welcomed as a balance to the current emphasis on between-sex variation. It could have been clarified by acknowledging the extent to which males and females represent fundamentally different mating strategies, since this affects how we view within-sex strategic variation. The distinction between conditional and alternative strategies could also have been highlighted.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , August 2000 , pp. 588
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)