Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:37:29.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The science of life as seen through Rose-coloured glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Mike Anderson
Mike Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia 6907 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary takes issue with two of Rose's central themes from the perspective of the psychology of intelligence. In the case of reductionism, I argue that Rose fails to live up to his own rhetoric by claiming a veto from his own discipline (biology) over facts of the matter in another (psychology). In the case of “Lifelines,” Rose's argument is contradicted by evidence from both individual differences and developmental change in intelligence.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , October 1999 , pp. 886 - 887
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)