Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:37:36.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kantian indifference about moral reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2019

Adam J. Roberts*
Affiliation:
Holywell Manor, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UH, United [email protected]

Abstract

The pessimistic arguments May challenges depend on an anti-Kantian philosophical assumption. That assumption is that what I call philosophical optimists about moral reason are also committed to empirical optimism, or what May calls “optimistic rationalism.” I place May's book in the literature by explaining how that assumption is resisted by Christine Korsgaard, one of May's examples of a contemporary Kantian.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, H. E. (2004) Kant's transcendental idealism. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, T. E. (1992) Dignity and practical reason in Kant's moral theory. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996) Practical philosophy, trans. Gregor, M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996a) Creating the kingdom of ends. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996b) The sources of normativity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (2008) The constitution of agency: Essays on practical reason and moral psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (2009a) The activity of reason. Proceedings and Addresses of the APA 83(2):2343.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (2009b) Self-Constitution: Agency, identity, and integrity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (2018) Fellow creatures: Our obligations to the other animals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
May, J. (2018) Regard for reason in the moral mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Street, S. (2010) What is constructivism in ethics and metaethics? Philosophy Compass 5(5):363–84.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. D. (2009) How we get along. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar