No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
How to build a baby: A new toolkit?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2011
Abstract
Carey proposes a theory of conceptual development that specifies innate conceptual representations that get learning started. Those representations are the output of innate domain-specific input analyzers. I contend that innate core cognition about agency is itself a gradual construction and that the role of Quinian bootstrapping needs elaboration to account for the development of intuitive theories of psychology.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
References
Bloom, P. (2004) Descartes' baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., Plunkette, K. (1996) Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. & Baillargeon, R. (2007) Do 12.5-month-old infants consider what objects others can see when interpreting their actions?
Cognition
105:489–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandler, J. M. (2004) The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, U., Carpendale, J. I. M. & Smith, L., eds. (2009) The Cambridge companion to Piaget. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, L., Poulin-Dubois, D., Demke, T. & Guay, A. (2009) Can infants use a nonhuman agent's gaze direction to establish word–object relations?
Infancy
14:414–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegler, R. S. (1996) Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
How to build a baby: A new toolkit?
Related commentaries (1)
Précis of The Origin of Concepts