No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
How does psychotherapy work? A case study in multilevel explanation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2015
Abstract
Multilevel explanations abound in psychiatry. However, formulating useful such explanations is difficult or (some argue) impossible. I point to several ways in which Lane et al. successfully use multilevel explanations to advance understanding of psychotherapeutic effectiveness. I argue that the usefulness of an explanation depends largely on one's purpose, and conclude that this point has been inadequately recognised in psychiatry.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
Ghaemi, S. N. (2010) The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2008) Explanatory models for psychiatric illness. American Journal of Psychiatry
165(6):695–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S. (2012) The dappled nature of causes of psychiatric illness: Replacing the organic–functional/hardware–software dichotomy with empirically based pluralism. Molecular Psychiatry
17(4):377–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S. & Campbell, J. (2009) Interventionist causal models in psychiatry: Repositioning the mind-body problem. Psychological Medicine
39(6):881–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S. & Campbell, J. (2014) Expanding the domain of the understandable in psychiatric illness: An updating of the Jaspersian framework of explanation and understanding. Psychological Medicine
44(1):1–7.Google Scholar
Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. & Chance, S. (2002) Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological Review
2:306–29.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. (2005) Remediable or preventable social factors in the aetiology and prognosis of medical disorders. In: Biopsychosocial medicine, ed. White, P., pp. 39–58. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Target article
Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science
Related commentaries (28)
A clinician's perspective on memory reconsolidation as the primary basis for psychotherapeutic change in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)1
Changing maladaptive memories through reconsolidation: A role for sleep in psychotherapy?
Clinical applications of counterfactual thinking during memory reactivation
Deconstructing the process of change in cognitive behavioral therapy: An alternative approach focusing on the episodic retrieval mode
Disruption of reconsolidation processes is a balancing act – can it really account for change in psychotherapy?
Emotion regulation as a main mechanism of change in psychotherapy
Focus on emotion as a catalyst of memory updating during reconsolidation
How do we remember traumatic events? Exploring the role of neuromodulation
How does psychotherapy work? A case study in multilevel explanation
Let's be skeptical about reconsolidation and emotional arousal in therapy
Memory reconsolidation and psychotherapeutic process
Memory reconsolidation and self-reorganization
Memory reconsolidation keeps track of emotional changes, but what will explain the actual “processing”?
Memory reconsolidation, repeating, and working through: Science and culture in psychotherapeutic research and practice
Mental model construction, not just memory, is a central component of cognitive change in psychotherapy
Minding the findings: Let's not miss the message of memory reconsolidation research for psychotherapy
Multiple traces or Fuzzy Traces? Converging evidence for applications of modern cognitive theory to psychotherapy
Psychopathology arises from intertemporal bargaining as well as from emotional trauma
Reconsolidation or re-association?
Reconsolidation versus retrieval competition: Rival hypotheses to explain memory change in psychotherapy
Reconsolidation: Turning consciousness into memory
Social-psychological evidence for the effective updating of implicit attitudes1
The importance of the rites of passage in assigning semantic structures to autobiographical memory
The nature of the semantic/episodic memory distinction: A missing piece of the “working through” process
The relevance of maintaining and worsening processes in psychopathology
Therapeutic affect reduction, emotion regulation, and emotional memory reconsolidation: A neuroscientific quandary
Top-down versus bottom-up perspectives on clinically significant memory reconsolidation
Trade-offs between the accuracy and integrity of autobiographical narrative in memory reconsolidation
Author response
The integrated memory model: A new framework for understanding the mechanisms of change in psychotherapy