Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:11:22.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

You can't give permission to be a bastard: Empathy and self-signaling as uncontrollable independent variables in bargaining games

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2005

George Ainslie
George Ainslie*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 116A, Coatesville, PA19320; and Temple University, Philadelphia, PA19140www.Picoeconomics.com
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Canonical utility theory may have adopted its selfishness postulate because it lacked theoretical rationales for two major kinds of incentive: empathic utility and self-signaling. Empathy – using vicarious experiences to occasion your emotions – gives these experiences market value as a means of avoiding the staleness of self-generated emotion. Self-signaling is inevitable in anyone trying to overcome a perceived character flaw. Hyperbolic discounting of future reward supplies incentive mechanisms for both empathic utility and self-signaling. Neither can be effectively suppressed for an experimental game.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , December 2005 , pp. 815 - 816
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

The author of this commentary is employed by a government agency and as such this commentary is considered a work of the U.S. government and not subject to copyright within the United States.

1. Determined canonical theorists might see such choices as a test of whether they had overcome “irrational” empathic urges – hence the reported epidemic of selfishness among economists (Frank et al. 1993).