Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Boice, Robert
and
Jones, Ferdinand
1984.
Why Academicians Don't Write.
The Journal of Higher Education,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 5,
p.
567.
Boice, Robert
Pecker, Gayle
Zaback, Ellen
and
Barlow, David H.
1985.
A challenge to Peters and Ceci's conclusions with an examination of editorial files for reviewer appropriateness.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
744.
Berry, Russell L.
1985.
Administrative freedom versus academic freedom and peer reviews.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
743.
Peters, Douglas P.
and
Ceci, Stephen J.
1985.
Peer review: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
747.
Cofer, Charles N.
1985.
Some reactions to manuscript review from a questionnaire study.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
745.
Sternberg, Robert J.
1985.
Tacit agreements between authors and editors.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
746.
Bailar, John C.
1991.
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.
Tyrer, Peter
1991.
Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
164.
Delcomyn, Fred
1991.
Peer review: Explicit criteria and training can help.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
144.
Roediger, Henry L.
1991.
Is unreliability in peer review harmful?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
159.
Nelson, Linda D.
1991.
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
158.
Mahoney, Michael J.
1991.
Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
157.
Kiesler, Charles A.
1991.
Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
151.
Crandall, Rick
1991.
What should be done improve reviewing?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
143.
Stricker, Lawrence J.
1991.
Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
163.
Gorman, Michael E.
1991.
Replication, reliability and peer review: A case study.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
149.
Fuller, Steve
1991.
Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
147.
Rourke, Byron P.
1991.
Toward openness and fairness in the review process.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
161.
Rosenthal, Robert
1991.
Some indices of the reliability of peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
160.
Cone, John D.
1991.
Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
142.