Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T00:00:45.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Steven Rose's alternative to ultra-Darwinism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

David L. Hull
David L. Hull
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stephen Rose's formulation of evolutionary theory is too scattered and impressionistic to serve as a genuine alternative to ultra- Darwinism. In addition, he has muddied a distinction that is crucial to our understanding of evolutionary phenomenona – the distinction between homologies and homoplasies.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , October 1999 , pp. 896
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)