Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:30:32.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-deceivers' intentions and possessions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

Michael Losonsky
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523 [email protected] www.colostate.edu/depts/philosophy/losonsky

Abstract

Although Mele's four sufficient conditions for self-deception are on track insofar as they avoid the requirement that self-deception involves contradictory beliefs, they are too weak, because they are broad enough to include cases of bias or prejudice that are not typical cases of self-deception. I discuss what distinguishes self-deception from other forms of bias.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)