No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Nearly Bayesian uncertain reasoning methods
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 1997
Abstract
Subjects are reported as being somewhat Bayesian, but as violating the normative ideal on occasion. To abjure probability altogether is difficult. To use Bayes' Theorem scrupulously when weighing evidence can incur costs without corresponding benefits. The subjects' evident nuanced probabilism appears both realistic and reasonable.
- Type
- Continuing Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © 1997 Cambridge University Press