Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:00:40.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual differences in mating strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

David M. Buss
David M. Buss
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1346; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 581 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J. H. & Nelson, F. D. (1984) Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences: 07–045. Sage Publications. [NGW]Google Scholar
Baker, L. A., Ho, H. -Z., Reynolds, C. & Kaku, L. (1991) Characteristics of the ideal mate: A twin study of mate selection. Abstract, 21st Annual meeting of the Behavior Genetics Association, St. Louis, MO. [NGW]Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992) The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press. [NGW]Google Scholar
Borkenau, P. (1992) Age preferences: The crucial studies have yet to be done. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 93–94. [NGW]Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989) Sex differences in human preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 1–49. [rDTK, DMB, NGW]Google Scholar
Buss, D. M.(1991) Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology 32:459–91. [NGW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M.(1994) The evolution of desire: Strategics of human mating. Basic Books. [DMB]Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. P. (1993) Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 100: 204–32. [DMB]Google Scholar
Dupré, J. (1992) Arbitrariness and bias in evolutionary speculation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 98–99. [NGW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, G. H. (1969) Appearance and education in marriage mobility. American Sociological Review 519–33. [DMB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press. [NGW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W. & Simpson, J. A. (1990) Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality 58: 69–96. [DMB, NGW]Google Scholar
Grammer, K. (1992) Variations on a theme: Age dependent mate selection in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 100–102. [NGW]Google Scholar
Harry, J. & DeVall, W. B. (1978) The social organization of gay males. Praeger. [rDTK, NGW]Google Scholar
Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L.J., & Fulker, K. W. (1989) Testing structural equation models for twin data using LISREL. Behavior Genetics 19: 9–35. [NGW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houle, D. (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195–204. [NGW]Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1988) LISREL: VII: Analysis of linear structural relationships. Scientific Software, Inc. [NGW]Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T. (1993) Do these sociobiologists have an answer for everything? (Commentary on Pérusse). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 299–300. [rDTK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Engstrom, C., Cornelius, J. S. & Keefe, R. C. (In preparation) Adolescents age preferences for dating partners: Support for an evolutionary model of life-history strategies. [rDTK]Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Croth, C. R., Trost, M. R. & Sadalla, E. K. (1993) Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality 6 Social Psychology 64: 951–69. [rDTK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenriek, D. T. & Keefe, R. C. (1992) Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 75–133. [rDTK, DMB, NGW]Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Brown, S. & Barr, A. (1994) Age preferences in homosexuals and heterosexuals. In preparation. [rDTK]Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G. & Trost, M. R. (1990) Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality 58: 97–116. [rDTK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinger, G. & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1992) Biological versus social psychological bases of mate selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 103–4. [NGW]Google Scholar
Mousseau, T. A. & Roff, D. A. (1987) Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59: 181–97. [NGW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neale, M. C. & Cardon, L. R. (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer Academic. [NGW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R. & Daniels, D. (1987) Why are children in the same family so different from each other? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: 1–16. [NGW]Google Scholar
Rajecki, D. W. & Lee, Rasmussen J. (1992) Personal ads as deviant and unsatisfactory: Support for evolutionary hypotheses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 107–8. [NGW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T. & Vershure, B. (1987) Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 730–38. [rDTK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, D. (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press. [rDTK, DMB]Google Scholar
Symons, D.(1980) Précis of “The Evolution of Human Sexuality.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 171–214. [NGW]Google Scholar
Taylor, P. A. & Glenn, N. D. (1976) The utility of education and attractiveness for females' status attainment through marriage. American Sociological Review 41: 484–98. [DMB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Wilcox, K., Segal, N. & Rich, S. (1988) Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 1031–39. [NCW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tellegen, A. & Waller, N. G. (in press) Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. In: Personality measures: Development and evaluation (vol. 1), ed. Briggs, S. R. & Cheek, J. M.. JAI Press. [NGW]Google Scholar
Udry, J. R. & Eckland, B. K. (1984) Benefits of being attractive: Differential payoffs for men and women. Psychological Reports 54: 57–56. [DMB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, N. G. & Zavala, J. (1992) A genetic and environmental analysis of human mate preferences: Testing Fisher's Fundamental Theorem. In preparation. [NGW]Google Scholar
Warren, C. A. B. (1974) Identity and community in the gay world. Wiley. [rDTK]Google Scholar