Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:18:13.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human sexual dimorphism, fitness display, and ovulatory cycle effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Jon A. Sefcek  and
Donald F. Sacco
Jon A. Sefcek
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0068. [email protected]://www.u.arizona.edu/~jons
Donald F. Sacco
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social roles theorists claim that differences between the sexes are of limited consequence. Such misperceptions lead to misunderstanding the important role of sexual selection in explaining phenotypic differences both between species and within humans. Countering these claims, we explain how sexual dimorphism in humans affect expressions of artistic display and patterns of male and female aggression across the ovulatory cycle.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 3-4 , August 2009 , pp. 288 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, R. R. & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition. Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Broder, A. & Hohmann, N. (2003) Variations in risk taking behavior over the menstrual cycle: An improved replication. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:391–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burriss, R. P. & Little, C. (2006) Effects of partner conception risk phase on male perception of dominance in faces. Evolution and Human Behavior 27:297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1998) Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research 35:19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W. (1999) The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social rules. American Psychologist 54:408–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G. G. Jr., Burch, R. L., Zappieri, M. L., Parvez, R. A., Stockwell, M. L. & Davis, J. A. (2003) The human penis as a semen displacement device. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:277–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, A. T. & Shackelford, T. K. (2006) Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans. Human Nature 17:265–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haselton, M. G. & Gangestad, W. (2006) Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior 49:509–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanazawa, S. (2000) Scientific discoveries as cultural displays: A further test of Miller's courtship model. Evolution and human behavior 21(5):317–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leutenegger, W. (1982) Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body weight and canine size in primates. Folia Primatologica 37( 3–4):163–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. F. (2000) Mental traits as fitness indicators: Expanding evolutionary psychology's adaptationism. In: Evolutionary approaches to human reproductive behavior, ed. LeCroy, D. & Moller, P.. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 709:62–74.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2001) Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts (Special issue on Evolution, Creativity, and Aesthetics) 2(1):20–25.Google Scholar
Petralia, S. M. & Gallup, G. (2002) Effects of a sexual assault scenario on handgrip strength across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior 23:3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plavcan, J. M. & van Schaik, C. P.. (1997b) Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 103:37–68.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sefcek, J. A., Brumbach, B. H., Vásquez, G. & Miller, G. F. (2006) The evolutionary psychology of human mate choice: How ecology, genes, fertility, and fashion influence our mating behavior. In: On the Evolution of Sexual Attraction, ed. Kauth, M. R.. Special Issue of the Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality 18 (2/3):125–82.Google Scholar
Wood, W. & Eagly, A. H. (2002) A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin 128:699–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed