Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:22:24.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expanding Nielsen's covert REM model, questioning Solms's approach to dreaming and REM sleep, and reinterpreting the Vertes & Eastman view of REM sleep and memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2001

Robert D. Ogilvie ,
Tomoka Takeuchi  and
Timothy I. Murphy
Robert D. Ogilvie
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, [email protected]@[email protected] www.psyc.brocku.ca/~rogilvie/sleep.html
Tomoka Takeuchi
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, [email protected]@[email protected] www.psyc.brocku.ca/~rogilvie/sleep.html
Timothy I. Murphy
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, [email protected]@[email protected] www.psyc.brocku.ca/~rogilvie/sleep.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nielsen's covert REM process model explains much of the mentation found in REM and NREM sleep, but stops short of postulating an interaction of waking cognitive processes with the dream mechanisms of REM sleep. It ranks with the Hobson et al. paper as a major theoretical advance. The Solms article does not surmount the ever-present problem of defining dreams in a manner conducive to advancing dream theory. Vertes & Eastman review the REM sleep and learning literature, but make questionable assumptions in doing so.

[Hobson et al.; Nielsen; Solms; Vertes & Eastman]

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 6 , December 2000 , pp. 981 - 983
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)